• 2.23 MB
  • 2022-06-17 15:54:15 发布

英语语块对英语语法习得影响的实证研究

  • 85页
  • 当前文档由用户上传发布,收益归属用户
  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、本文档内容版权归属内容提供方,所产生的收益全部归内容提供方所有。如果您对本文有版权争议,可选择认领,认领后既往收益都归您。
  3. 3、本文档由用户上传,本站不保证质量和数量令人满意,可能有诸多瑕疵,付费之前,请仔细先通过免费阅读内容等途径辨别内容交易风险。如存在严重挂羊头卖狗肉之情形,可联系本站下载客服投诉处理。
  4. 文档侵权举报电话:19940600175。
声明本人郑重声明:所呈交的学位论文,是本人在指导教师的指导下,独立进行研究所取得的成果。除文中已经注明引用的内容外,本论文不包含其他个人或集体已经发表或撰写过的研究成果。对本文的研究做出重要贡献的个人和集体,均已在文中以明确方式标明。本声明的法律责任由本人承担。论文作者签名:穸呼^免孑⋯日期:一塑!主!堑:生关于学位论文使用权的说明本人完全了解太原理工大学有关保管、使用学位论文的规定,其中包括:①学校有权保管、并向有关部门送交学位论文的原件与复印件;②学校可以采用影印、缩印或其它复制手段复制并保存学位论文:③学校可允许学位论文被查阅或借阅;④学校可以学术交流为目的,复制赠送和交换学位论文;⑤学校可以公布学位论文的全部或部分内容(保密学位论文在解密后遵守此规定)。签名:孵哆孑日期:劢/岁、莎,莎导师签名:日期:印/岁.矽·6 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ANEMPIIUCALRESEARCH0NTHEIMPACTOFENGLISHLEXICALCHUNKSONGRAMMARACQUISITONABSTRACTGrammarteachinghasbeenallindispensableandessentialpartofforeignlanguageteaching.Traditionalgrammarteachingisakindofteachingandpracticingofgrammaticalrules,whosedisadvantageshavebeendiscussedformanyyears.People,amongwhomisKrashen,havebeenarguingthatgrammaticalstructuresCannotbetransformedintounconsciouslanguageability.However,withthetheoryoflanguagechunksbeingpopular,researchersfoundthatgrammarisnolongerafixedstructurebutaunityofstructuresandmeaning,whichismutativeanddiscoursal.Thatistosay,foreignlanguageteachersshouldseeandteachgrammarinanewperspective.Researchersofthetraditionallinguisticshavepaidmuchattentiontogrammaticalrulesandholdtheopinionthatlanguagecommunicationmeansmakingupsentences谢t11grammaticalstructures,whileresearchersofthetheoryoflexicalchunksstatethatweshouldfocusonlexicalchunksingrammarteaching,whichCanhelplanguageleamerstousethetargetlanguagebetterandmakesecondlanguagesmoregrammaticalanddiscoursailyacceptable.Aslexicalchunksincludebothgrammarandlexicons,whicharealsocalledindivisiblelexicons,lexicalchunksCanbeseenasanidealunitofgrammarteaching.So,learninglexicalchunksCanhelplanguagelearnershaveamorefluentandaccurateoutputofthetargetlanguageandstrengthentheirsenseofaccomplishment.Atthesametime,goodoutputisalsogoodforbettermemoryandstorageoftargetlanguagesSOastoimproveefficiencyof删2㈣弱删5Ⅲ9洲3舢Z舢Y 太原理工大学硕士学位论文learningandspeaking.ThestudyisbasedonthetheoryofLexicalApproachbyMichaelLewis(1997).InLewis’part,languageisnotmadeupwithtraditionalgrammarandlexiconsbutmadeupwithmulti-wordprefabricatedchunks,whicharereferredtoasclusters,chunksorbundles.Lexicalchunksareanessentialcomponentoffluentlinguisticproductionandakeyfactorinsuccessfullanguagelearning.Thisresearchisaimingatsolvingthefollowingproblems:1)Canlexicalchunksbetaughtandacquiredbystudents.2)Canlexicalchunksteachinghelpgrammarteachingmorethantraditionalteaching.3)Whatarethepossibleinfluenceoflexicalchunksongrammaracquisition?Thestudyisundergonebybothquantitativeanalysisandqualitativeanalysis.Twoclassesofcollegefreshmenareinvolvedandoneistheexperimentalclassandtheotheristhecontrolclass.Thereare30non—Englishuniversitystudentsinbotlltheclasses.Theresearchertestsallofthem、Ⅳitllessaywritingatfirst.Theirscoreswillbetestedbyone·wayANOVAtoseeifstudentsinthetwoclasseshaveasignificantdifference.Thenteachingthetwoclassesinadifferentwayisundergoingawholesemester.Theexperimentalclassistaughtknowledgeaboutlexicalchunks.Teachersteachhowtotellandusethelexicalchunksandaskthemtopracticeoverandoveragain.Thenstudentsareaskedtoaccumulatelexicalchunksandpracticethemastheirhomework.Atthesametime,thecontrolclassistaughtinthetraditionalway,afterwhichthesametaskofessaywritingtestsboththetwoclassesandtheirfinalscoresaretestedbypairedsamplesT-testtoseeiftheyhavesignificantdifferenceswitllscoresofthefirsttestandaretestedbyone-wayANOVAtomakeoutifthetwoclasseshavesignificancesaftertheexperiment.Afteranalyzingthedatacollectedintheexperiment,theresearcherfindsoutthatlexicalchunkstheoryhasapositiveeffectonthegrammarteachingandlearning,whichCaneasilyproveLewis’lexicalapproachtheory(1993)。ThisisquiteusefulinthefieldofSLAandSLteaching.ItcanwellguidelanguageteacherstoteachEnglishinanewwayandguideresearcherstOhavethinkingongrammarteaching.;i 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Along淅t11thequantitativeanalysis.qualitativeanalysisisalsoused.TheresearcheranalyseshowmanylexicalchunksthestudentsuseandteststhenumberanddiversityoflexicalchunksthestudentsuseandiflexicalchunksCanhelpimprovethesituationofchinglish,repeatedexpressionsandinappropriategrammarstructuresTheresearcherlearnsfromthequantitativeanalysisthatlexicalchunkscanbetaughtandacquired.ItCanhelpimprovetheabilityofaccuracyandwordsdiversity.Thestudentsintheexperimentalclassmakemoreprogressinmanyaspectsthanthoseinthecontrolclass.KEYWORDS:grammaracquisition,lexicalchunks,SLA 太原理工大学硕士学位论文 太原理工大学硕士学位论文英语语块对英语语法习得影响的实证研究摘要语法教学一直是外语教学中一个不可或缺的组成部分,传统的语言学过分关注语法规则,认为语言交际就是运用语法规则遣词造句。传统语法教学是对语法规则的讲解和操练,其弊端已被讨论多年,研究者认为语法结构无法转变为无意识的语言能力,领军人物为Krashen(1981)。随着语块理论的兴起,研究者发现语法不仅仅限于固定的结构形式,更是变化的、语篇的,语法与意义形成有机的统一。教师应从新的角度去看待语法、教授语法。语块理论表明,语块本身就是语法和词汇相互渗透,不可分割的“语法化的词汇”,所以,语块可以看做是理想的语法教学单位,帮助语言学习者更好的运用目标语,使二语更具有语法、词汇、句法和语篇的合适性。同时,语块的学习可以增加语言习得者的流利性和准确性,增强其成就感,表达更加地道,有利于更好的记忆和存储并且提高听和读的处理效率。本实验研究的理论依据是Lewis(1997)的语块理论(LexicalApproach)。语块包括搭配、固定或半固定短语、习语,它能使语言输出变得更加方便、快捷和流利。此理论认为,本族语人的语言之所以流利,是因为他们的词汇不是单个存储在记忆里,而是以词块的形式储存在记忆里,在使用的时候整体提取,减少了语言提取的时间和困难。在学习和应用语言时,词汇是第一位的,语法只起辅助作用,语言意义的产生和实现主要是通过语块而不是靠语法结构完成。本研究采取定量和定性的研究方法通过实证分析,来研究语块辅助语法教学是否比传统语法教学更加有效,是语块研究领域的另一比较创新之处,对促进语块教学的发展及语法教学的进步都有一定的意义。 太原理工大学硕士学位论文实验中被试为大学两个非英语专业班级,一个为实验班(30人),一个为对照班(30人)。教材为<<新视野大学英语>>第一册,实验班以语块教学为主线,结合英汉语块的相互关系,集多种任务教学法、翻译法及自觉实践法、吸收输出一系列教与学的活动,引导学生辨认、学习、使用和积累语块,并形成英汉语块的对照和对比。对照班实施常规教学。实验期限为一个学期。前后测分别为同一篇命题作文,分别从其词汇多样性、准确性、完整性、流利性四方面来评定。实验前通过单因素方差检验证明两个班确实无显著性差异。实验结束后,通过比较均值,分析两个班内分别有何差异以及两个班之间的差异,并通过配对样本T检验来检查实验班和对照班的成绩分别有无显著变化,再通过单因素方差检验检查两个班的成绩在实验后有无显著性差异。定量分析的同时,作者对学生作文中语块使用的情况进行了定性分析,通过分析学生作文中语块使用的数量和多样性来分析其使用语块的情况,对单词重复率高、中式英语较多和语法使用牵强的情况是否有改观。结果证明:语块可以通过真实的课堂习得,而且语块教学理论下的实验班学生比普通教学下的控制班的学生在语法能力方面有更显著的进步。关键词:语法习得,语块教学,二语习得Vl 太原理工大学硕士学位论文————————————————————————————————————————————————————一————————————————————————————一CONTENTSABSTRACT⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯1摘要⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.VCONTENTS⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯VIIListofTables........................⋯.......⋯...⋯............⋯...........·⋯..···IXListofAbbreviations.⋯..⋯.⋯.⋯...⋯..⋯⋯..⋯...⋯...⋯⋯.⋯.⋯⋯⋯XIChapterOneIntroduction..................⋯..⋯.................⋯..⋯.····11.1OrganizationoftheThesis⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯一11.2SignificanceofResearchesonLexicalChunks...⋯.....⋯.....⋯⋯⋯⋯....⋯....⋯......11.3A‘msoftheThesis⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯4ChapterTwoLiteratureReview............⋯.........................····52.1LiteratureReviewoftheLexicalChunks⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.52.1.1ConceptionofLexicalChunks⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯52.1.2CategoriesofLexicalChunks⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯72.1.3FunctionofLexicalBundlesforSecondLanguageLearning⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯102.2LiteratureReviewofGrammarTeaching⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..142.2.1TheDefinitionofGrammar⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.142.2.2PreviousStudyofGrammarTeaching⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯152.2.3DifferentApproachesofGrammarTeaching⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..162.3LexicalChunksinGrammarTeaching⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯l‘72.4TheoreticalFrameworkoftheThesis⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..20ChapterThreeMethodology.⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯...⋯..............⋯.....⋯..·233.1Introduction⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.233.1.1PurposeandSignificanceofPresentStudy⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.233.1.2ResearchQuestions⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.243.2DesignoftheResearch.⋯.....⋯......⋯...........⋯⋯....⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯⋯253.2.1Subjects⋯⋯⋯⋯......⋯.........⋯.⋯.........⋯⋯⋯....⋯.⋯⋯......⋯⋯⋯.......⋯..,.⋯...25V1l 太原理工大学硕士学位论文3.2.2ResearchMethods⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.⋯...⋯...⋯⋯..⋯..253.3ProceduresoftheResearch⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..273.3.1PreparationfortheExperiment⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..273.3.2Pre-testoftheExperiment⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯283.3.2.2ReliabilityofEssayTest⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯3I3.3.3TeachingApproachesAppliedinEachClass⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯.......333.3.4Post-testaltertheExperiment⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.41ChapterFourResultsandDiscussions..................................434.1ComparisonwithinEachClass.⋯⋯.⋯........⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..⋯.434.1.1ComparisonwithintheCon20lClass⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..434.1.2ComparisonwithintheExperimentalClass...............⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯454.2ComparisonbetweentheExperimentalandControlClass⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.464.3QualitativeAnalysisoftheResults⋯⋯⋯...⋯⋯⋯..⋯..⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯....⋯..⋯⋯...⋯484.4SummaryandDiscussion⋯⋯........⋯⋯............⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯....⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯......49ChapterFiveMajorFindingsandImplications...................535.1Majorfindings⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.535.2ImplicationsofPedagogyandLearningStrategy⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯545.2.1ImplicationsforTeachers⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯545.2.2ImplicationsforStudents⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..575.2.3ImplicationsforCollegeEnglishEducation⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯585.3LimitationsofthePresentResearchandSuggestionsforFurtherResearch⋯..595.3.1LimitationsofthePresentResearch⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯595.3.2SuggestionsforFurtherResearchers⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..60ChapterSixConclusion⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯.⋯.......................⋯..........63BIBLIOGRAPHY⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯..65ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.69PUBLISHEDPAPERS⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯71V111 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ListofTablesTable2.1ClassificationsofLexicalChunks⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.9Table3.1CommonErrorsinComposition⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯30Thble3·2ReliabilityAnalysisoftheEssayTask⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.31Table3.3Item.TbtalStatisticsofReliabilityAnalysis⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.31Table4-1MeanValuesComparisonwithintheControlClass⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯.43Table4.2PairedSamplesTestwithintheControlClass⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯.⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯.44,】阻ble4—3MeanValuesComparisonwithintheExperimentalClass⋯⋯⋯⋯.45Thble4-4PairedSamplesTestwithintheExperimentalClass⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯。46Table4—5MeanValuesComparisoninthePost.testbetweentheTw0Class477Table4.6ANOVA2ofthePost.test⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯48 太原理工大学硕士学位论文X 太原理工大学硕士学位论文SLASLTEFLListofAbbreviationsSecondLanguageAcquisitionSecondLanguageTeachingEnglishasaForeignLanguageSWECCLSpokenandWrittenEnglishCorpusofChineseLearnersFLFS(s)CELCET4FormulaicLanguageFormulaicSequence(s)ChineseEnglishLearnersCollegeEnglishTestBand4Ⅺ 太原理工大学硕士学位论文 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ChapterOneIntroduction1.1OrganizationoftheThesisThethesisconsistsoffivechapters.Thefirstchaptergivesabriefintroductionabouttheaimsofthisthesis,thesignificanceofresearchesonlexicalchunks,andthegeneralorganizationofthisthesis.Thesecondchaptergivesadetailedliteraturereviewoflexicalchunks,includingdefinition,classification,andfunctionoflexicalchunksandcurrenttheoreticalfindings.ChapterThreemainlytalksabouttheempiricalresearch,whichincludestheintroductionofresearchobjectives,subjects,instruments,proceduresandSOon.Datacomingfromboththepre-testandpost-testareanalyzedanddiscussedaccordingtOtwohypothesesandonequestion.Thetwohypothesesarea)lexicalchunkscanbetaughtinarealclass;b)TheknowledgeoflexicalchunksandEnglishgrammarproficiencyarepositivelycorrelated.Thequestionis:towhatextentarethetwofactorsrelated?Thechapterfourisconclusionforthisthesis.Inthispart,theauthorsummarizesthewholethesisandproposessomesuggestionsforbothstudentsandteachersandforfurtherstudy.ChapterfiveistheconclusionofthewholepaperandshowstheexpectationOthefultherresearching1.2SignificanceofResearchesOilLexicalChunksThestudyoflexicalchunksdatedfromnearly70s’ofthelastcentury.Researchersbelievedthataconsiderableproportionofourdailyutterancesarenotgeneratedbyrulesbutretrievedasawholefromstorage.Sinclairclaimed”Alanguageuserhasavailabletohimorheralargenumberofsemi-preconstructedphrasesthatconstitutesinglechoices,eventhoughtheymightappeartobeanalyzableintosegments”(1991).Accordingtothispoimofview,increasinglylargenumberofresearchersacceptedtheideathatlanguageisgeneratedinlexicalchunksratherthanonewordbyoneword.ThenitbroughtoutalotofempiricalstudiestOtestifythistheory.Amongtheresearchers,Sinclair(1991),NattingerandDecarrico(2000), 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Lewis(1993)andWray(2008)areofthegreatestsignificance.InLexicalPhrasesandLanguageTeaching,NattingerandDeCarrico(2000)dividedlexicalchunksintofourkinds.Theyarepolywords,institutionalizedexpressions,phrasalcons仃aintsandsentencebuilders.Atthesametime,accordingtodifferentpragmaticenvironment,theyCallalsobeclassifiedintothreekinds:socialinteractions,necessarytopicsanddiscoursedevices.Heclaimedthataleamer’SabilitytoapplyprefabricatedchunksoflanguageCandeterminehisorherpragmaticcompetence.Frequentmulti·wordcombinationsareveryefficientunitstoassistcommtmicationbymakinglanguagemorepredictabletothehearer.Sinclair(1991)said,mosteverydaywordsdonothaveanindependentmeaning,ormeanings,butarecomponentsofarichrepertoireofmulti-wordpatternsthatmakeupatext.Thisistotallyobscuredbytheproceduresofconventionalgrammar.InTheLexicalApproach,MichaelLewis(1993)assertedthatlanguageisnotgrammaticallexiconsbutlexicalgrammar.Peopleputoutlanguageinchunksbutnotwordbyword.LanguageisstoredasfixedcollocationsthatCanberetrievedasawhole.Lewisconvincinglyclaimsthatteachersshouldnotonlyteachtraditionalgrammarbutalsoshouldfocusmoreonlexicalchunks,whichhavenotbeenputintopracticeoverlastdecades.However,atleast,itiswidelybelievedthattherearefixedexpressions,pattemsandcollocations.Asaresult,instructionforlexicalchunkshasbecomeresearchers’focus.Wray(2008)declaredthattherearealmostfortykindsofnamesofthephenomenonandmostofthemexpressedsimilarmeaning.TheextensiveUSeofpre-fabricatedsequencesas’’ithasbeenreportedthat”Canhelptorecognizethetextregistertoreadersandsaveprocessingtimebyusingfamiliarchunkstorelatenewinformation.‘InChina,therearealsomanyresearcherspayingattentiontothefieldoflexicalchunks.YangYuchen(1999)talkedabouttheclassificationsandpragmaticfunctionsoflexicalchunks.Heclaimedthatlexicaichunkscanbreakthroughthelimitofwordsandtheirfunctionsarenotonlybeyondcollocationbutalsoassociated、析t11discourse2 太原理工大学硕士学位论文andpragmatic.ShenMinyu(1999)didtheresearchfromtheperspectiveofEnglishpedagogicsandmainlyillustratedthedisciplineandmeaningoflexicalchunksinEnglishteaching.WangChengxiang(2000)summarizedtheessentialtheoryofworkingmemory,accordingtowhich,heanalyzedthecharacteristicsofEnglishstudyandputforwardanewwayofthinkingofLexicalteaching:guidinglearnerstolearnandrememberlexicalchunksconsciouslySOthattheyCanreducethetimeofprocessinginformationandhelpingthemformaeasilyactivatedmemorialstructure.SongDesheng(2002)statedthatthecapacityofworkingmemoryisverylimited,whichiscalledlexicalchunks.LearnersCanstrengthentheirabilityofinputandoutputofEnglishbylearningknowledgeoflexicalchunks.YahWeihua(2003)pointedoutthatbothgrammarapproachandcommunicativeapproacharetooextremeandlexicalchunksapproachistheproperunitforvocabularyteaching.Corpuslinguististsholdtheopinionthatknowledgeoflexicalcompetencemayhelpimproveabilityofgrammaticalrules,becausegrammarCanhelpunderstandthedifferentrelationshipsamongfamiliesofwordsandtheconl/no/lcollocationsofwords.Richards(2000)claimedthefollowingremarks:Vocabularyandlexicalunitsareattheheartoflearningandcommunication.NoamountofgrammaticalorothertypeoflinguisticknowledgeCanbeemployedincommunicationorcansustainagreatdealofrudimentarycommunicationwithoutmuchsupportfromotheraspectsofthelanguagesystem.Understandingofthenatureandsignificanceofvocabularyknowledgeinasecondlanguagethereforeneedstoplayamuchmorecentralroleintheknowledgebaseoflanguageteachers.Whilealotofresearchersputforwardtheoryaboutlexicalchunks,manyotherresearchersdidsomeempiricalresearches.YanWeihua(2004)didaresearchtostudyiflexicalchunksinfluencelexicalstudyandmadeaconclusionthattheknowledgeoflexicalchunkscallhelpimprovelearners‘abilityofusingthetargetlanguageproperly.YaoYubao(2003)didaresearchtolookformerelationbetweentheabilityoforalEnglishandknowledgeoflexicalchunks.Hefoundthataftertrainedwithlexicalchunks,learners’levelofspokenEnglishmadegreatprogress.PuJianzhong(2003)3 太原理工大学硕士学位论文alsodidasimilarresearchandholdthatvocabularyteachingshouldstrengthenlexicalchunksteaching.EventhoughtherearesomanyresearcherswhohavegivenUSavarietyofknowledgeoflexicalchunks,therelatedempiricalresearchisnotsufficienttosupportthem.Therearesomeempiricalresearchesthatarementionedabove,buttheyarenotcomprehensive.Atthesa//letime,therearesomeempiricalresearchesthatfocusontherelationshipbetweenlexicalchunksandspokenlanguage,betweenlexicalchunksandEnglishwritingorbetweenlexicalchunksandlistening.Therearenotmanyresearcherspayingattentiontotherelationbetweenlexicalchunksandgrammarability.DolexicalchunkssuggestapositiveinfluenceonSLlearners’grammarability?Thisisunknownandacreativeproblemtosolve.Thisthesis,therefore,isaimingatsolvingthisproblemintheresearchonlexicalchunks.1.3AimsoftheThesisThisresearchregardsLexicalApproachasthetheorybaSis,aimingattestingiflexicalchunksCanbetaughttoEnglishlearnersandiflexicalchunksteachingCallhelpimprovelearners’grammarabilitymorethantraditionalteachingmethods.AswhattheresearcherhaSsaidabove,grammarinthispapermeansnotonlythestructuralrulesbutalsopragmaticmeaning.Itisacombinationbylexiconsandstructure.Grammarabilityincludesabilityofusinglexiconsandstructuralrules,abilityoforganizingacontext,abilityofcommunicatinginthetargetlanguageandSOon,whichisaconceptioninabroadsense.4 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ChapterTwoLiteratureReview2.1LiteratureReviewoftheLexiealChunks2.1.1ConceptionofLexicalChunksInatraditionalperceptive,languageteachingresearchershaveviewedgrammarandvocabularyasadivide,amongwhichgrammarmeansrulesofstructuresandvocabularyusuallymeanssingleword.Thestructuresareviewedaspriority,vocabularybeingregardedassecondaryinimportance(Sinclair&Renouf,1988).However,researchersfoundthatlanguageisnotjustaboutgrammarandvocabulary.Prefabricateditemsorlexicalchunksmakeupalargepartofanativespeaker’Sspokenandwrittenoutput.Nativespeakers’utterancesare“grammatical’’aswellas“nativelike”,however,mostofthegrammaticallywell—formedsentencesarenotnativelike,thatistosay,naturalformsofexpressionarenotalwaysformedbythegrammaticalrulesaswelearn.Consequently,learnersshouldnotonlymastergrammaticalrulesbutalsoprefabricateditemsandlexicalchunks.(Sinclair,1991).Asaresult,increaSinglymoreresearchersbegintopayattentiontoresearchesonprefabricateditemsandlexicalchunksinrecentyears.ThepublicationofMichaelLewis’TheLexicalApproachin1993especiallyhighlightsthestatusoflexicalchunksinlanguageteachingandlanguagelearning.ThisthesisisbasedorlthetheoryofTheLexicalApproachbyMichaelLewis(1997).InLewis’part,languageisnotmadeupwithtraditionalgrammarandlexiconsbutmadeupwithmulti—wordprefabricatedchunks,whicharereferredasclusters,chunksorbundles.Lexicalchunksareanessentialcomponentoffluentlinguisticproductionandakeyfactorinsuccessfullanguagelearning.ThefollowingiswhatLewis(1993)proposedinhisLexicalApproach:1.Lexisisthebasisoflanguage.2.LexisismisunderstoodinlanguageteachingsincegrmnmarisassumedtObethebasisoflanguageandmasteryofthegrammaticalsystemisassumedtobea5 太原理工大学硕士学位论文prerequisiteforeffectivecommunication.3.Thekeyissueofalexicalapproachisthat“languageconsistsofgrammaticalisedlexis,notlexicalizedgrammar"’.4.Oneofthecentralorganizingprinciplesofanymeaningcenteredsyllabusshouldbelexis.Thestudyoflexicalchunkshasalonganddistinguishedhistoryinappliedlinguistics,datingbacktoTespersen(1924)andFirth(1951).Theypopularizedtheterm”collocation⋯withthesaying”youshalljudgeawordbythecompanyitkeeps”.Later,NatingerandDecarrico(1992)haveemphasizedtheimportanceoffrequentmulti.wordcombinations.IntheirbookLexicalphrasesandLanguageTeaching,theyintroducedtheteachingapproachapplyinglexicalchunks.Theysaidthatlearningmulti.wordcombinationscanbeawayofassistingcommunicationbymakinglanguagemorepredictabletothehearer.Theysaidthatlexicalchunkscouldbeappliedinthreeparts:(i)teachingspokendiscourse:conversation(ii)teachinglisteningdiscourse:listeningcomprehension(iii)teachingwritingdiscourse:readingandwriting.TheysuggestedthatmoreattentionshouldbepaidtolexicalchunkspractisingandteacherSshouldteachmoreaboutlexicalchunksandshouldnotmistakegrammarasskills.Hoey(1991)slatedthatcollocationortherelationshipthatalexicalitemhaswithitemsthatappearwithoccurredmorethangreaterrandomprobabilityinitstextualcontext.WrayandPerkins(2000)saidthatlexicalchunksshouldbestoredinandretrievedwholefrommemoryatthetimeofuseratherthangeneratedanewoneachoccasion.MichaelLewis(1993)summarizedresearchresultsofthepreviousscholarsandresearchers,whichsaidthatlanguageshouldberecordedtogetherwhichcharacteristicallyoccurstogether.HeinTheLexicalApproachstatesthatlexicalchunksincludecollocations,phrasesandidiomsandSOon.Nativespeakersmemorizelanguagebychunksratherthansingleword.Thiscarlsavetimetoproducelanguageandhelpunderstandothersbetter.6 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Accordingtodifferentresearchers,therearealmost40kindofdifferentdefinitionoflexicalchunksanddifferentterms,suchas”prefabricatedchunks”(Becher,1975),”formulaicutterances”(WongFillmore,1978),”lexicalitems”(Sinclair,1998),”lexicalPhrases”(Nattinger&DeCarrico,1992),”lexicalizedsentencestems”(Pawley&Syder,2004).andSOforth.However,nomatterhowmanydifferentversionsofthisconceptionthereare,theyarethesamemoreorless,andinthispaper,theresearcherprefersusing”lexicalchunks”,whichhasbeenwidelyusedinthisfieldandCanaccountforthisphenomenonprecisely.2.1.2CategoriesofLexieaiChunksAswhathasbeendiscussedabove,acommonnativespeakerisusuallyabletomastertensofthousandsoflexicalchunks,whichCanhelpthemputoutpurestexpressionoftheirlanguagefluently.Asaresult,thelexicalchunkscanberegardedasthetinestunitandtheindispensablepartsindailycommunicationallanguage.Thatistosay,lexicalchunkshaveitsfundamentalpositioninsecondlanguageacquisition.Sowecangiveaneasyconclusionthatbeforelexicalchunksaretaughtinarealclass,itsclassificationisindispensable.However,astheresultofdifferentdefinitionoflexicalchunks,therearealsosomedifferentkindsofwaysofclassifyinglexicalbundles.Avarietyofclassificationsoflexicalchunksareputforwardbyrelatedscholarsfromdifferentperspectives.Thatistosay,alotofcomplicatedtermsanddefinitionscausecertaindifficultiestotheclassificationoflexicalchunks.HeretheresearcherwouldliketogiveabriefintroductionofclassificationoflexicalchunksfromdifferentperspectivesOneofthefamousclassificationWasproposedbyBecher(1975)fromtheperspectiveoffunctionandstructure.HeholdsthatlexicalchunksCanbedividedintosixgroups.Theyare1)polywords,whichreferstowordsstringsormorethanonewordsasawholetoexpressasingemeaningsuchas”asaresult”and”inadditionto”;2)phrasalconstraints.Theymeansthosephrasesframeworkconsistingoffixedtermssuchas”to⋯up”,”towrapitup”,and”totieitup”etc.:3)metamessages7 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Theyreferstothosephrasesusedtoreplacesomethinginadiscoursesuchas”asithasbeenclaimedthat”and”That。Sall”;41sentencebuilders.Theyaretheframeworkofinstitutionalizedfullsentenceswherebydecodecomplextext;5)situationalutterances.Theyreferstoshortphraseorfullsentenceexhibitingpragmaticpurpose,suchas”whatabout⋯”and”wouldyouliketo⋯”;6)verbatimtexts.Theyarecutoutdirectlyfromtheoriginalbooksorothertextsandarestoredasawholesuchas”tobeornottobe,it’Saquestion”(Becker,1975).DespitethefactthatBecket’Sclassificationisnotspecificenough,itundoubtedlylaysabasicfoundationandbuildsaveryusefulframeworkforfurtherresearchoflaterlanguagereseachers.AnotheroneofthefamousclassificationWasputforwardbyNatinggerandDeCarrico(1992).Theydividedlexicalchunksintofourgroups.Theyarepolywords,institionalizedexpressions,phrasalconstraintsandsentencebuilders.Heholdstheideathatlexicalchunksarerelatedwithbothstructuresandfunctionsconstrainedbycertaincontext.Thisclassificationemphasizedonfunctionsoflexicalchunksandclassifiedlexicalchunksaccordingtotheirfunctions.Thesestructurescanbeshownbyfourcategories,forexample,fixedphrases,semi--fixedphrasesandsentenceframework.AnotherclassificationoflexicalbundleswasputforwardbyHowarth(1998).Heassertedthatlexicalbundlesincludefunctionalexpressions,compositeunits,lexicalcollocationsandgrammaticalcollocations.Healsodivideslexicalchunksfromtheperspectiveofgrammar.HeholdstheideathatlexicalchunksCanbedividedintothreecategories:a)pureidiom.b)analogyidiom.C)limitedcollocation.AccordingtoLewis,lexicalchunksfallintofourtypes,andtheyareWordsandPolywords,Collocation,InstitutionalizedExpressionsandSentenceFramesandHeads.Tobespecific,theresearcherwillillustratewhatlexicalbundlesareandhowtheyarelikeindifferentgroupsasthefollowingtableaccordingtheclassificationofI,e、vjs.8 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Table2.1ClassificationsofLexicalChunks(Source:Lewis,1993)classificationexamplesdeftnitionPolywordsSofarSOgood,inaddition,forwordsstringsormorethangood,allinalletc.onewordasawholetoexpressasingemeaningCollocationAccountfor,paysinglewordCO-Occurswithattention,lookforwardtoetc.otheritems谢mhi曲frequencyInstitutionalizedThat’Sa11d#t.mayIhelpshortphraseorfullsentenceexpressionsyou?Excuseme.Wouldyouexhibitingpragmaticpurposelike⋯SentenceframeItisbelieved/reportedthat⋯,theframeworkofthefactthat⋯institutionalizedfullsentenceswherebydecodecomplextext.Fromtheperspectiveoffunctionoflexicalchunks,Howarth(1998)hasdividedlexicalchunksintothefollowingfourcategories:1)functionalexpressions.Theyrefertowordclustersthatactasdiscoursalconnections,such鹪”itiSsaidthat⋯”;21compositeunits.Theyrefertothosephrasesorshortsentencesthataremadeaccordingtogrammar,suchas”lookafter..”;3)lexicalcollocations.Theyrefertothosephrasesthataremadeupbytwoopen-words,suchaS”payattention”;4)grammaticalcollocations.Theyrefertophrasesthataremadeupbyanopenwordandaclosedword.Fromwhathasbeendiscussedabove,wecangiveaconclusionthatmanyresearcheshaveattemptedtoestablishaunifiedclassificationstandard.However,itisdifficultbecausetheirclassificationstandardsaredifferent.Thatistosay,theyclassifylexicalchunksfromdifferentperspectivesandsomeofthemmaybeoverlapped.9 太原理工大学硕士学位论文2.1.3FunctionofLexicalBundlesforSecondLanguageLearningAsthesecondlanguageresearchersfind,Lexicalchunkscanbeaverybeneficialtoolforlearnerstoleanasecondlanguage.TheresearcherwillsummarizethefunctionsputforwardbydifferentresearchersaSfollowing.Firstofall,lexicalchunkscanhelpshortenthetimeofrememberingthetargetlanguage.Asweknow,rememberingisoneofthemostessentialpartsoflanguagelearning.Learnershavetorememberaconsiderablenumberofwords,sentencesandgrammar.Asaresult,howtorememberefficientlyandquicklyisakeyproblemofsecondlanguagelearning.AccordingtoascientifictheorybyGuishichun(1985),lexicalchunksarequiteadvantageousforremembering.Sensoryregistermeanssensorystore.OursensorymodalityCanstorecolor,sound,picturesandwordsandSOoninOurdailylifewithoutbeingchangedforaveryshorttime.Shorttimememoryisalsocalledworkingmemory.Itmeansthatwhenpeoplerealizesomethingexisting,itmaybestoredforashorttime.Workingmemoryisveryuseful,forwehavetoprocessthemessagefromsensoryregisterinit.Lettheresearchershowanexample,whenlistenershearaphraSe,theyhavetostoreitinworkingmemoryforfurtherlisteninginordertounderstandthemaccuratelybycombiningthemtogether.Theycanknowthatthemorechunksinworkingmemory,theharderforpeopletorememberforthelongprocessingtime.ThentheimportanceoflexicalchunksCanbeeasilyseen.LexicalchunksCanreducethenumberofrememberunits.Foraspecificexample,whenlearnersrememberthissentence:”ThefactthatitwillraintomorrowisSOfarSOgood”.Asweknow,therearetenwordsinthissentence.LearnersCanstoredthemastenpiecesinworkingmemory.However,iflearnersapplylexicalchunkstorememberit,theyCandivideitintofourpartsas”thefactthat⋯is⋯”,”itwillrain”,”tomorrow”,and”SOfarSOgood”.Asthepiecesareless,thetimeofprocessingalsoreduces.So,theresearchersCaneasilyconcludethatlexicalchunkscallhelptorememberthetargetlanguagefasterandeasier.Then,lexicalchunksCanhelpunderstandthetargetlanguagemorequickly,orwecallsaythatlexicalchunksCanhelpenhancethelearners’pragmatic10 太原理工大学硕士学位论文competence.Fromthefirstfunctionoflexicalbundles,theresearchcanknowthattheyhelplearnersdecodingthetargetlanguagemorequickly.Iflistenersdon。thavetheknowledgeoflexicalchunks,theyhavetounderstandasentenceafterhearingthewholesentence,becauseprogressofunderstandingisactuallyprogressofmakingthepiecestogether.Iflistenershavetheknowledgeoflexicalchunks,theycanunderstandthetargetlanguagemorequickly.Everylexicalchunkhasitsownpragmaticfunction.Theuseoflexicalchunksislimitedinorconstrainedtoaspecificenvironment.Thatistosay,theuseoflexicalchunkshasaverystrongcontextdependency.Lexicalchunksthatarerelatedorexpressingthesimilarfunctionsaresupposedtobestoredinthehumanmemorybytheformofsemanticfield.Speakerscallautomaticallyselectthemostsuitablechunksinaccordancewiththespecificenvironmentsuchasdifferentcontextsordifferentobjects.Asaresult,lexicalchunkshelplanguagelearnersaquireacertaindegreeoflanguagecompetence.AsNattingerandDeCarrico(2000)havesaid,thepragmaticfunctionoflexicalchunksmainlycontainssocialinteraction,necessarytopicsanddiscoursedevices.Eachaspectoftheminvolvesavarietyofspecificfunctions.Takesocialinteractionasanexample.ThepragmaticfunctionsoflexicalchunksCanbemadeupofcalling,responding,insertingthetopic,clarifyingthedoubt,changingthesubject,conversinglanguageround,endingtheconversation,sayinggoodbyeandSOon(Ellis,1999).Understandingofthespokendiscourse,includingtwoaspects,namely,1)communicationparticipants’understandingofeachother"sspokendiscourse;2)thethirdperson’Sunderstandingofthedialoguebetweenthetwosides.ThecooperativeprincipleofGrice(HerbertPaulGrice,1975)pointsoutthatinordertoachievesmoothandfluentcommunicationordialogue,bothsidesmustabidebytheestablishedprinciplesofcommunication.Inordertoachieveasmoothandharmoniouscommunication,tounderstandtheoppositepersonisthekey.Twopeopleshouldbeabletopredicteachother’Scommunicativeintention,andthenmakeappropriateresponses.Asisindicatedabove,lexicalchunkscontainsfixedphrasesandsentences,whichreferstothecommonlyusedsentencepa_ttemsandframeworksSpeakersusethesentencesoflanguagechunksSOthattheoppositepersoncallpredict11 太原理工大学硕士学位论文communicativeintentiontOtheotherparty.Becauseineverydaycommunicationalenvironment,inordertoachieveaparticularcommunicativepurpose,somesentencesoflexicalchunksarefrequentlyusedandfixeddowngradually,andthenbecomeacommunicationalsets.AslongaLSalargeamountofthisl(indoffixedphrasesandsentencesorsetsalestored,speakerscanunderstandtheoppositepersonimmediately,andCanalsoquicklyspeculateabouteachother’Scommunicativeintention.Forexample,”Iamsorry,but⋯”,whichisakindofeuphemismtorefusethelistenerEllisalsoholdsthatsocialknowledgeisofgreatimportancewithinalanguagecommunityanditCarlhelpspeakersuseappropriatewordsatappropriatetimeandappropriatesituation.Forexample:Canyouhelpme?”Couldyouhelpme?”Couldyoupleasehelpme?”1waswonderingcouldyouhelpme?”Couldyoupossiblyhelpme?”Excuseme.1wouldappreciateifyoucouldhelpme.”Suchkindofphrasesexpresssimilarmeaningsandmaybeusedindifferentsituations.Theymayhelpmakestudentsputthefixedphraseswitlltheirpragmaticfunctiontogetherandpayattentiontocontextualcons缸aintsoflanguagebeforerealdialogsbegin.Sotheresearchercallconcludethatlexicalchunkscanalsoenhancethelearners’languageawarenessandhelpmaketheirforeignlanguagecommunicationmoreappropriate.Thethird,lexicalchunksCanhelpavoidnegativetransferofmothertongue.Forexample,iflearnershavelearnedthephraseof”havingameeting”or”havinglunch”,theywillnotbeinclinedtouse”openingameeting”or”eatinglunch”whichareprobablynegativelytransferred.ThisisthepragmaticusageoflexicalbundlesThefourth,lexicalchunksCans仃engthenthecommunicationalability.KnowledgeoflexicalbundlesCanprovidefixedsentencepatternsinordertosavethetimeofmakingupthemandavoidtheproblemoflackingenoughexpressions.They 太原理工大学硕士学位论文areespeciallygoodfornewlearnerstocommunicateintargetlanguageThefourth,lexicalchunkscallhelpEnglishlearnerstospeeduptheprocessingofArticlesordialoguetoconveytheintentionoftheoppositeside.Thatistosay,lexicalchunkscanhelptoincreasetheefficiencyofcommunicationbetweenthetwocommunicators.Therearealwaysdiscoursemarkersinadialogueorarticle.Andthesemarkersareoftenlexicalchunks.Theresearcherwillillustratesomeexampleshere.Whenpeoplewouldliketointroduceatopicindetails,theymayuse”Thereareseveralreasonsfor⋯,butingeneral,theycomedowntOthreemajorOBeS⋯”or”Therearemanyfactorsthatmayaccountfor⋯,butthefollowingarethemosttypicalones⋯”or”ManywaysCallcontributetosolvingthisproblem,butthefollowingonesmaybemosteffective.”Whenpeoplewouldliketomakeaconclusion,manylexicalchunkscanalsopresenttheintension.Forexample,Fromwhathasbeendiscussedabove,wemaysafelydrawtheconclusionthat⋯.,Thedata/statistics/figuresleadUStotheconclusionthat...andItCanbeconcludedfromthediscussionthat...Articlesofdifferenttypesoftentakeadvantageofdifferentlexicalchunksorframework.Forexample,ataleoftenbeginsasonceuponatime,thereis⋯.WhileargumentationoftenbeginsbyItiswellknownthat.../AsfaraS⋯isconcerned/Itgoeswithoutsayingthat⋯/ItCallbesaidwithcertaintythat⋯/Astheproverbsays,/Ithastobenoticedthat⋯/It、Sgenerallyrecognizedthat⋯/Everyoneknowsthat⋯/.Duringsecondlanguageacquisition,learnersoftenmastercertainknowledgeofthetargetlanguage,theyCannotoftenperformlikenativespeakers,whichismainlyduetothefactthatlearnershavenotmasteredenoughidiomaticitems.Forexample,whenpeopleexpressthatsomethingisveryeasy,nativespeakermaysaythatitisapieceofcakewhilesecondlanguagelearnersmaysaythatitiseasydirectly.Asaresult,theaccurateuseoflexicalchunksCanhelpEnglishlearnerstospeeduptheprocessingofarticlesordialoguestoconveytheintentionoftheoppositeside.Itisindispensableforsecondlanguagelearnerstomasterenoughlexicalchunkstogetmoreproficientlanguageskills.Intheend,masteringlexicalchunksisadvantageousforsecondlanguagelearnerstobeconfidentandbelievethemselvesthattheycallbeabletousethetarget 太原理工大学硕士学位论文languageproperly.TheresearchonSecondlanguageAcquisitionstudieshasprovedthatsecondlanguagelearnersareoftengoingthroughasilentstageatthebeginningoflearning(Hanania&Gradman,1977).Thereasonisthatatthebeginningoflearningasecondlanguage,learnersarealwaysafraidofspeakingoutfort11eydonotmasterenoughappropriatephrasesorsentences,whichmayseriouslyaffecttheirenthusiasmforlearningasecondlanguage.Tosomeextent,themasteringoflexicalchunksCanhelpavoidthissituation.Lexicalchunkscarlhelpbeginnersofsecondlanguageleamingtobreakthisembarrassingsituationwell.Becauselexicalchunksarethefixedwordsclustersorphraseswithspecificpragmaticfunctions,learnersCansimplyrecitethemandstorethemasawholeandthendirectlyapplythemtocommunication.Asaresult,lexicalchunksCangreatlylightenbeginners’pressureoncommunicativelanguagecodingandhelplearnersspeakthetargetlanguagefluently.Thatiswhymasteringknowledgeoflexicalchunkscanraiselearners’self-confidenceandmotivatethemtospeakoutbravely.2.2LiteratureReviewofGrammarTeaching2.2.1TheDefinitionofGrammarAccordingtodifferentresearchers,grammarhasitsdifferentdefmition,becausetheydefineitfromvariousperspectives.Inanarrowsense,grammarisadescriptionoftherulesoflanguage,itincludesthevocabularyvariationrulesandsentencebuildingrules,(Widdowson,1999).However,inabroadsense,grammarisnotonlyadescriptionofrolesbutalsoadynamicconception.HuZhuanglin(2000)statedthatifthepurposeoflanguageteachingistohelplearnershowtousethetargetlanguageproperly,thegrammarshouldberegardedasadynamicsystemratherthanastaticsystem.GeorgeYule(2002)claimedthatgrammarCanberegardedasastructuralsystem.Differentcontextmeaningcanleadtodifferentgrammarstructure.Meaning,formandusagearethethreeaspectsofgrammarsystem.Thatistosay,grammarisnotonlyadsescription14 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ofrules.Larsen.Freeman(2005)putforwardtheconceptiongrammaring,whichincludesmorphosyntax,semanticsandpmgmatics.Allofthethreeaspectsaffecteachother.Thatistosay,changesofeachofthemCanleadtochangesofothers.Lettheresearchersummarytheabove.Grammarisnotonlyadescriptionofrulesbutalsoadynamicsystemincludingstructure,meaningandusage.Itisrelatedtothepmgmaticsaswellasastructuralsystem.Inthispaper,wetalkaboutlearners。grammarlevel.Herethegrammarmeansthegrammarinabroadsense.Itinvolveshowtousealanguagestructurallycorrectandpragmaticallyperfect.2.2.2PreviousStudyofGrammarTeachingDulay&Burt(1974)foundthatpeoplelearnlanguagesinthesameordenThatistosay,nowthatitisnotnecessaryforlearnerstoleamgrammarwhentheyacquiretheirmothertongue,secondlanguageCallbeacquiredunconsciously.ItCanbecalledCommunicativeApproach.AstheCommunicativeApproachbecamemoreandmorepopular,Grammarteachingwasincreasinglyquestionablesincethe1970s.OneofthedoubterWaSKrashen(1981).Krashenputforwardthatitisdistinctivebetweenlearninglanguageconsciouslyandacquiringlanguageunconsciously.Heclaimedthatlearningconsciouslyisnotanefficientwaytogettheabilityofusingthelanguageunconsciously.Thenheholdthatlanguageshouldbelearnedfromabsorbingthetargetcorporabutnotlearnedwithroles.Skehan(1998)andDekeyser(1998)alsoagreedwithKrashen.Theybelievedthatgrammarteachingcan04provideddeclarativeabilityanditisriouseforoutputofthetargetlanguage.ThentheUniversalGrammarTheoryfurtherlyprovedthatleaminggrammarisnotnecessaryforasecondlanguagelearner,becauseeveryoneisborn、析t11thetheoryofuniversalgrammar.15 太原理工大学硕士学位论文However,谢t11developmentofsecondlanguageacquisitionresearching,theUniversalGrammarwasincreasinglydoubted.Firstly,Schmidt(1997)putforwardtheNoticingHypothesisTheory.Heclaimedthatnoticingisindispensableinlearningaforeignlanguage.That’Swhythereareinterlanguagesandindividualdifferencesamonglanguagelearners.AlotofresearchersagreewithSchmidt.Researchersgotinterestedingrammarteachingagainfrom1970s,becauseresearchersfoundanewsequenceofsecondlanguageacquisition.Throughallempiricalresearch,Pinemann(1984)foundthatgrammarteachingCallspeeduplearningsomestructureandhelplearnersusethemmore幽11fully.Thenheputforwardtheteachabilityhypothesis.TheotherreasonwhygrammarteachingroseagainWasthattheCommunicativeApproachwasnotthatidealasimagined.CommunicativeApproachcannotleadarightwayofusinggrammarandgrammarteachingisnecessary.Larsen-Freeman&Long(2000)thoughtthateventhoughgrammarteachingCannotchangethesequenceofsecondlanguageacquisition,itcarlstrengthenandimprovesecondlanguageability.2.2.3DifferentApproachesofGrammarTeachingThereareseveraldifferenttheoriesandschoolsofgrammarteaching.Allofthemregardgrammarasdifferentroles.GrammarTranslationApproachtakesnoticeofthechangeofstructureandfocusesOntranslationbetweenthetargetlanguageandthemothertongue.Sentencesarethebasicunitofthisteachingmethod.ReadingApproachaimsathelpingimprovelearnersreadingabilityandtranslationisalsoitsmainapproach.DirectApproachappliestheinductivemethod,whichadvocatesthatmothertonguesshouldbeavoidedinclassesandteachersandstudentsshouldcommunicatewiththetargetlanguage.OralSituationalApproachadvocatesthatlearnersshouldknowvocabularyoftargetlanguagewellandthenbetaughtgrammarinsituationaldialogues.AudiolingualismApproachalsoappliesinductivemethod,whichpaysattentiontOlisteningandspeakingskills.Thisapproachmainlyfocuseson16 太原理工大学硕士学位论文imitating,recitingandsentencebuilding.TheCognitiveApproachclaimsthatgrammarmustbetaughtdirectlynomatterinthedeductivewayorinductivewayThisapproachemphasizesthatgrammarshouldbelearnedaSasystemandtrytoregardcognitivepsychologyandtransformationalgenerativegrammarasthetheoreticalbaSis.Affective-humanisticApproachavoidsteachinggrammarpurposelyItemphaSizedlearners’personalemotionandmeaningfulgroupexchanges.Thistheorystatesthatlearningaforeignlanguageisanexperienceofself-actualizationandlearnersshouldlearnaforeignlanguageintheclaSsenvironmentratherthanlearnitonpurpose.ComprehensionBaSeApproachemphasizesonlisteningandmeaningfulinputforlearners.Iflearnersmakemistakes,theyshouldnotbecorrected.Itclaimedthatgrammarcanhelplearnersmonitorwhattheydobutithasnothingtodowitllhelpinglearnersacquireaforeignlanguageorevenuseiffluently.TheCommunicativeApproachpaysattentiontolistening,peaking,readingandwritingandfocusesonrealsceneandcommunicativeability.Thismethodemphasizessocialandsemanticfunctionoflanguageandpayslessattentiontogrammarandvocabulary.TheTaSk-baSedApproachmakestasksaSmainteachingcontent,whichencourageslearnerstofulfilltasks,fromwhichlearnersCanacquiretargetlanguagenaturally.Itisakindofautomaticlearningandcooperativelearning,whichisquitepopularnowadays.Eventhoughtherearealotofdifferentapproachesforteachinggrammar,therearefewapproachesthatCancombinegrammarandlexistogetherandCanavoidchiglishanddumbEnglishefficiently.HoweveLsincetheoryoflexicalchunksappears,researcherspayhi曲attentiontothecombinationofgrammarteachingandlexicalchunkstheory.Thepityisthattherearestillfewresearchersdoingsomeempiricalexperimentforit.2.3LexicalChunksinGrammarTeachingTheabovemethodsofteachinggrammarareallnotperfectandcontroversialSomeofthemPayattentiontocommunicativefunctionwhichneedatargetlanguage 太原理工大学硕士学位论文environment.Asweknow,wearenotaEnglish-speakingcountry.Itisdifficultforeverylearnertobeimmergedinsuchabeneficialenvoriment.Asaresult,someresearchersclaimthattheyarenotpractical.Otherwise,somemethodspaytoomuchattentiontostructureteaching.Learnerscanmastergrammaticalrules;however,theycarlnotgetaproficientoutput.Thatistosay,toomuchknowledgeofstructuralruleswithoutoutputpracticeisnotaidealwaytoteachaforeignlanguage.ThesemethodsareverycommoninChinaandthat’SwhythereisSO—calleddumbEnglish.LearnersCanreadbutnottalk.AlotofEnglishteachersandresearchershavemadegreateffortstostudylexicalchunksandSLA.TheygiveUSaguideandtheoreticalbasistodothefollowingresearch.SinceLewisputforwardthatlexicalchunkseouldbeputintopracticalclassroomsin1977,increaselygreatnumberofresearchersbegantoexploresecondlanguageacquisitionfrommulti-dimensionsbasedonlexicalchunks.BusinessMatterswasdesignedbyMarkPowelltoteachstudents’lexicalchunksknowledgeforfluentandaccurateoraloutput.Moudrala(2001)summarizedavarietyofmethodstoinstructlearnerstolearnandrememberlexicalchunks,amongwhichareintensiveandextensivereading,listeningandwritingandSOon.DavisandKryszewska(2003)declaredthatlexicalchunksisbeneficialforlearnerstomasteridiomaticlanguageandgethighertestscores.Mostofthepreviousstudiesabovearefocusingonfirstlanguageacquisitionwhileagreatnumberofresearchersclaimedthatsecondlanguageorforeignlanguagecouldbetaughtinthesimilarwayasfirstlanguageteaching.Whatismore,CorpuslinguististsholdthesameopiniontoLewis.Theanalysisofcomputercorpomshowedthatcollocationandwordsphrasesexistasclusters.Atthesametime,someofthelinguististsimprovesLewis’theoryandinventsmoremethodsoflexicalchunksteaching.Wi也regardtoresearchesonlexicalchunksinChina.manyinvestigationshavealsobeendone.LifeiandChenXianglanclaimthatmultidimensionalstudyonlexicalchunksshouldbeadvocatedandgaveanoverallliteruraturereviewonCurrentstudiesofresearchingandteachingoflexicalchunksinChina.AccordingtotheresearchoflexicalchunksbyYangYuchen(1999),therearelexcialchunksinnearly90%natural1R 太原理工大学硕士学位论文utterance;theknowledgeoflexicalchunksisquitenecessaryanddispensableinsecondlanguageacquisition.InconsiderationofthefunctionofLexicalchunks,WangLifeiandZhangDafeng(2006)indicatedthatlexicalchunkscanalsoexplaindevelopmentofinterlanguageaswellassecondlanguageteachingandlearning.AtthesalTletime,LiTaizhi(2006)furtherdeclaredthatlearninglexicalchunksisanefficientwaytoimprovetheabilityofbusinesswriting.AswhatLevishasclaimed,languageacquisitionisakindofcognitivebehavior.FangLingling(2010)didaresearchtotestifyiftheLexicalApproachCanhelpraisetheawarenessoflexicalchunks,enhancediscoursalcompetence,improvelanguageoutputandreducelanguagefossilization.Eventhoughthereareincreasinglygreatnumberofresearchersbegintodoavarietyofresearchestheseyears,empiricalresearchesarestillverylacking.ResearchesoftestingwhatistherelationshipoflexicalchunksandEnglishteachingarestillinsufficient.Challengingtraditionalapproachwitllemphasisofusageofisolatedwords.teachersshouldattachmuchimportancetotheapplicationoflexicaichunks.Inthispaper,alloftheabovequestionsaretresearchingthepointsandtheresearcherdoesitfromtheaspectofgrammarteaching.Grammarteachinghasbeenanindispensableandessentialpartofforeignlanguageteaching.Traditionalgrammarteachingisakindofteachingandpracticingofgrammaticalrules,whosedisadvantageshavebeendiscussedformanyyears.People,amongwhomisKrashen,havebeenarguingthatgrammaticalstructuresCannotbetransformedintounconsciouslanguageability.However,、析t11thetheoryoflanguagechunksbeingpopular,researchersfoundthatgrammarisnolongerafixedstructurebutaunityofstructuresandmeaning,whichismutativeanddiscoursal.Thatistosay,foreignlanguageteachersshouldseeandteachlanguageinanewperspective.Researchersofthetraditionallinguisticshavepaidmuchattentiontogrammaticalrulesandhavetheopinionthatlanguagecommunicationmeansmakingupsentences埘mgrammaticalstructures,whileresearchersofthetheoryoflexicalchunksstatethatweshouldfocusonlexicalchunksingrammarteaching,whichCan1q 太原理工大学硕士学位论文helplanguagelearnerstousethetargetlanguagebeRerandmakesecondlanguagesmoregrammaticalanddiscoursallyacceptable.Aslexicalchunksincludebothgrammarandlexiswhichalealsocalledindivisiblelexis,lexicalchunkscanbeseen嬲anidealunitofgrammarteaching.So,learninglexicalchunksCanhelplanguagelearnershaveamorefluentaccurateoutputofthetargetlanguage,andstrengthentheirsenseofaccomplishment.Atthesametime,goodoutputisalsogoodforbettermemoryandstorageoftargetlanguagesSOastoimproveefficiencyoflearningandspeaking,whichisthehypothesisofthispaper.Inaword,languageisnotdividedintostructuralrulesandisolatedwordsandlexicalchunksarelocatedsomewherebetweenthem.Inordertoavoidtheseparationofwordsfromstructuralrules,lexicalchunksareaperfectunittoteachgrammar,whichmeansinabroadsense:grammarinvolveshowtousealanguagestructurallycorrectandpragmaticallyperfect.2.4TheoreticalFrameworkoftheThesisThisthesisisbasedonthelexicalchunkstheorybyLewis.MichaelLewis(1993)summarizedresearchresultsofthepreviousscholarsandresearchers,whichsaidthatlanguageshouldberecordedtogetherwhichcharacteristicallyoccurstogether.HeinTheLexicalApproachstatesthatlexicalchunksincludecollocations,phrasesandidiomsandSOon.Nativespeakersmemorizelanguagebychunksratherthansingleword.ThisCallsavetimetoproducelanguageandhelpunderstandothersbetter.AccordingtoLewis,lexicalchunksfallintofourtypes,andtheyaleWordsandPolywords,Collocation,InstitutionalizedExpressionsandSentenceFramesandHeadS.InLewispart,languageisnotmadeup、Ⅳitlltraditionalgrammarandlexiconsbutmadeupwithmulti—wordprefabricatedchunks.Heclaimsthatlanguageisnotgrammaticalizedlexiconbutlexicalizedgrammar.Lexicalchunksareidentifiedaccordingtothetheoryofpartiesconfirmingmethod(Schmia,eta1.,2004),whichisaartificialwayofidentifyinglexicalchunks. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文TwoteacherswhohavealreadyunderstoodtheknowledgeoflexicalchunkswellidentifylexicalchunksinthetextbooktogetherandmakethefinaldecisiontogetherItisefficientandsufficientforthisexperiment.Firstly,thetwoteachersidentifylexicalchunksineveryunitrespectively.Thentheypickoutwhattheyunanimouslyregardaslexicalchunksanddiscusstheinconsistentopinionandthenmakethefinaldecisiontogether. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文 太原理工大学硕士学位论文3.1IntroductionChapterThreeMethodology3.1.1PurposeandSignificanceofPresentStudyThepresentstudyaimsatinvestigatingiftheteachingoflexicalchunkscallhaveapositiveeffectonstudents’abilityofgrammarandproposingsomepedagogicalimplications.DespitethefactthatmostofthefindingssuggestapositiveroleforlexicalchunksinSecondLanguageAcquisitiondevelopment,aquestionremainsthatiflexicalchunksCanbeapositivefactorforgrammarteachingandifitcan,thenhowitworksPractically,thesignificanceofpresentstudyismainlypresentedasthefollowingfourparts:Tobeginwith,thisresearchaimsatimprovingEnglishlearners’grammarabilitybyshiftingOurfocusfromanalysingtoteaching.Previousresearchesarefocusedontheaccumulationofagreatnumberofisolatedwords,whichturnedouttobeaunefficientpracticebyerroranalysisfromstudents’essaysduringstudies.Inaddition,thisresearchistryingtoexploreanewteachingperspectivetocombinevocabularyandgrammarintheteachingofsecondlanguageacquisitionespeciallyinstudents’grammaracquisition,andhelplookforawaytoreducelearners’languageprocessingtimeindifferentcontexts,whichwilllessenstudents’learningburdenandcutsomeobstaclesinorganizingoutput.Then,thepaperaimsatbridgingthegapbetweentraditionalConstructionApproachandCommunicativeApproach.ResearchesoneffectofteachingLexicalChunkstoimprovegrammarabilityinintensivereadingclassisrareinpreviousempiricalstudies.Asaresult,someoriginalideasshouldbeturnedoutfromthis 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ereanveresearch.Thelastbutnottheleast.Thisthesismayactivatetheinterestofresearchersonlexicalchunkstoshifttheirfocusfromtheorytoempiricalresearchinrealclassesandexcogitatemoreeffectiveteachingandlearningstrategies.InChina,thecommonsituationisthatresearchesonlexicalchunksaremostlydescriptiveandthereisfewexperimentalresearchontherelationshipbetweenlexicalchunksandgrammarability.Inrecentyears,linguistsandforeignlanguageteachersarebecomingawareoftheimportanceoflexicalbundlesinlanguagelearningandteachingamongwhomareBecker’Payley&Syder,Nattinger&DeCarrico,WillisandLewis.Theyhavecarriedoutcomprehensivestudiesonlexicalchunks.However,mostofpreviousstudiesonlexicalchunksstillstayatthetheoreticallevel.Thoughafewempiricalstudiesonlexicalchunkshaveemerged,nearlyfewstudieshasbeenundertakenwithconcerningtheapplicationoftrainingofEnglishlexicalchunksinarealEnglishclass,letaloneresearchesonitsinfluenceonstudents‘Englishgrammarability.ThisresearchregardsLexicalApproach(Lewis,1993)asthetheorybasis,aimingattestingiflexicalchunkscarlbetaughttolearnersandiflexicalchunksteachingCanhelpimprovelearners’grammarabilitymorethantraditionalteachingmethods.Astheresearcherhassaidabove,grammarinthispapermeansnotonlythestructuralrulesbutalsopragmaticmeaning.3.1.2ResearchQuestionsThisthesissupposesthattheteachingoflexicalchunkscanraiseEnglishlearners’capabilityinEnglishgrammar.Toprovethisproposition,thefollowingresearchesareadvanced.Questionsaresolved:(1)Canlexicalchunksbetaughtinarealclass?(2)Canteaching,memorizingandapplyinglexicalchunkshaveanyinfluenceonthecapabilityofEnglishgrammarbyChinesecollegestudents?(3)Whatarethepossibleinfluencesoflexicalchunksongrammaracquisition?24 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Atthesametime,Theresearchedanalysiseshowmanylexicalchunksthestudentswoulduseandtestthemmaberanddiversityoflexicalchunksthestudentsuseandiflexicalchunkscanhelpimprovethesituationofchinglish,repeatedexpressionsandinappropriategrammarstructures3.2DesignoftheResearch3.2.1SubiectsTheresearchinthethesisinvolves60freshmenwhoarechosenfromtwonaturalclassesofGrade2012inaUniversityinTaiyuan.Therearenearly3000studentsofGrade2012amongwhichthese60studentsaremajorsofScienceofLaw.Theiraverageageis19.OneofthetwoclassesisdesignatedasallExperimentalGroupwith30students,amongwhom1aremalesand19arefemaleswhiletheotherasaControlGroupamongwhom10aremalesand20arefemales.Allofthemarenon—Englishmajorsundertheinstructionofthesameteacher.3.2.2ResearchMethodsThisthesisaimstoinvestigatetheeffectsoftrainingoflexicalchunksonthegrammarabilityofcollegestudentsbybothquantitativeandqualitativeapproaches.Tobeginwith,Thequantitativeapproachemphasizesontherelationshipbetweentheapplicationoflexicalchunksandgrammarabilityofcollegestudentsaccordingtofourmajorvariables:writingaccuracy,writingfluency,completenessandwordsdiversity.TherearetwoEnglishteachersmakingthefinalscoresofthewritingteststogether.Beforetheirscoring,theyaresupposedtoknowtheknowledgeoflexicalchunksanddiscussthescoringstandardinordertoavoidbiasandsubjectivity.Atthesametime,inordertoavoidinfluencingonthetwoteachers,allthewritingsaremessedup.Thatistosay,thetwoteachersdonotknowwhoisintheexperimentalclassandwhoisinthecontrolclassduringtheirscoring. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Atthesametime,thequalitativeapproachexplorestheabilityofstudentstoapplylexicalchunks,howstudentsmemorizeandemploylexicalchunksintheirEnglishwritingandiflexicalchunksarebeneficialtotheimprovementofhighwordrepetitionrateandinappropriategrammarusing.Timespanoftheexperimentissixteenweeks.Duringthesixteenweeks,theControlGroupistaught、析t11traditionalteachingmethodswithtraditionalassignmentwhiletheExperimentalGroupistaughtinalexicalchunksmethodwitllrelatedassignment.Duringtheexperiment,theteachershouldrecognizewhichexpressionisalexicalchunk.Onewayoftellingifaexpressionisalexicalchunkistoaskthreetrainedteacherswhohavelearnedenoughknowledgeoflexicalchunkstopickupexpressionstheyconsideraslexicalchunks.IftIleyarelexicalchunks,theteachershouldfocusonteachingthemtostudentsandaskingthemtopracticeoverandover.Therearetwotestsbeforeandaftertheexperiment.Oneiscalledpre-testwhiletheotheriscalledpost·test.Boththepre-testandpost—testareacompositionwitllthesametitleandrequests.ScoresaregivenaccordingtOthefollowingfouraspects:writingaccuracy,writingfluency,writingaccuracy(4marks),writingfluency(4marks),completeness(4marks)anddiversity(4marks).Aftereachtest,scoresofeachstudentarecollectedandanalyzedbySPSSwithIndependentSamplesTestandone—wayANOVA,whichaimsatinvestigatingiflexicalchunkshaveainfluenceongrammarabilityamongthestudents.Alongwiththequantitativeanalysis,qualitativeanalysiswillalsobeused.TheresearcherwillanalyzehowmanylexicalchunksthestudentswoulduseandtestthenumberanddiversityoflexicalchunksthestudentsuseandiflexicalchunksCanhelpimprovethesituationofchinglish,repeatedexpressionsandinappropriategrammarstructures.Theexperimentlastsforsixteenweeks.Duringthisperiod,allthestudentsinthetwonaturalclassattendclassesroutinelywithoutabsence.BoththeexperimentalclassandcontrolclassareundertheinstructionofthesameEnglishteacherbut、历tlldifferentteachingapproaches. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文3.3ProceduresoftheResearchThestudywillbedividedintofourstepswitllbothquantitativeanalysisandqualitativeanalysisThefirststepisforthetwoteacherstoidentifylexicalchunksfromthetextbookamongthecollocationandsentencesthatwillbenewlytaughtinthelaterclassThesecondstepisapre-testtotestifthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweentheexperimentalclassandthecontrolclass.Onlytherearenosignificantdifferencesbetweenthetwoclassescalltheresearcherbeginthesecondstep.Thethirdstepistoteachthetwoclassesindifferentapproaches.Theexperimentalclasswillbetaughtknowledgeaboutlexicalchunks.Teacherswillteachhowtotellandusethelexicalchunksandaskthemtopracticefromdifferentwaysoverandoveragain.Thenstudentsfireaskedtoaccumulatedlexicalchunksandpracticethemastheirhomework.Atthesametime,thecontrolclasswillbetaughtinthetraditionalway.Thiswillundergoawholesemester.Stepfourcomessoonaftersteptwo.Apost—testisusedtotesttheirfmalscoresbypairedsamplesT-testtoseeiftheyhavesignificantdifferencescomparedwithscoresofsteponeandwillbetestedbyone-wayANOVAtomakeoutifthetwoclasseshavesignificanceaftertheexperiment.3.3.1PreparationfortheExperimentBeforetheclassbegins,theteacherisresponsibleforlookingforlexicalbundlesinthetextbookwhichisthemainteachingresourceduringtheclass.Sofar,therearetwowaysoftherecognitionandextractionoflexicalchunksOneistechniquesbasedoncorpus(Biber,et.,1999)andtheotheristhepartiesconfirmmethod(Schmitt,eta1.,2004).Techniquesbasedoncorpusisbasedorlthefrequencyanddistributionofcorpusstandards,namely,thefrequencyanddistributioninthecorpus,reachingacertainstandardoflanguagefragmentisjudgedtobelexicalchunks.UsuallythelexicalchunksaredefinedasNwordscombinationthatappearF27 太原理工大学硕士学位论文timespermillionwordsandhaveacertaindistribution.Extractingwordsfrequency,becometheextractionoffrequencypoints.Wordsfrequency,whichisequaltoorgreaterthanfrequencypointsofwords,aretreatedasfrequencyoflexicalchunks.Standardofextractionifofuncertaintyatpresent.Thereare10times,20timesand40timespermillionofwords.ToconfirmbyPartiesistheintegrateduseofliteraturecollection,corpusandartificialidentificationmethodtodeterminethelanguagechunks.Firstlyabout200candidatechunksshouldbeselectedfromtheliterature,andthentheyareexaminedinspokenlanguage,penandacademiccorpora.74candidatechunksarechosenamongthematerial诵t11thehi曲estfrequencyofthethreecorporaselected.Thensomelanguageteachersidentifyagainandtheneventuallyidentify20targetwords(Schmitt,2004).Thisexperimentadoptsamorecommonway:twoteacherswhohavealreadyunderstoodtheknowledgeoflexicalchunkswellidentifylexicalchunksinthetextbooktogetherandmakethefinaldecisiontogether.Itisefficientandsufficientforthisexperiment.Firstly,thetwoteachersidentifylexicalchunksineveryunitrespectively.Thentheypickoutwhattheyunanimouslyregardaslexicalchunksanddiscusstheinconsistentopinionandthenmakethefinaldecisiontogether.ThestudentsinthisexperimentareallfreshmenwhoseEnglishtextbookistheNewHorizonCollegeEnglish1duringtheresearch.Inthecontrolclass,theteacherteachesinatraditionalwaywithoutmentioningtheconceptoflexicalchunks.Atthesametime,theknowledgeoflexicalchunksandthestrategyofnoticingandmemorizinglexicalchunksareemphasizedintheexperimentalclass.Theyaretaughtthatlanguageisnotjustvocabulariesandrulesofgrammar.3.3.2Pre-testoftheExperimentPre-testtaskoftheexperimentisacomposition,whichischosenfromTEM4entitledLimitingtheUseofDisposalBags.Thestudentsarerequiredtofinishitwithin30minutsandthenumberofwordsshouldbeabove250.Duringthewriting, 太原理工大学硕士学位论文allofthe60studentsareforbiddentouseadictionaryoranyotherreferences.3.3.2.1ColleetionoftheDataEachstudentcallgetfourscoresaccordingtothefollowingfouraspectsaccuracy,fluency,completenessandlanguagediversity.Everyaspect’Stopmarkisfo眦(1)MeasureofWritingAccuracyTherateoferror-freeT-unitsisallindexofwritingaccuracylevelthatisdecidedbytherateofwhollycorrectT-units,whichmeanserror-freesentences.ThismethodisaccordingtoadefinitionbyHunt.HeclaimedthatT-unitisamainclausewithallsubordinateclausesandnon.clausalstructuresattachedtoorembeddedinit(Hunt,1970,citedinGales,1980).Forexample”Theking,whosepowerisunlimited,andwhosetreasuressurmountallrealandimaginarywants,iscompelledtoease,bytheconstructionoftheGreatWall,thesatietyofdominionandtastelessnessofapyramid,thesatietyofdominionandtastelessnessofpleasure.”ThislongandcomplicatedsentenceconsistsofoneT-unit.Onthecontrast,“I"mbusy,but1willgotothemeetinglater.”Eventhoughitisquiteashortsentence,thissentenceismadeupbytwoT-units.Accordingtothetwoabovekindofsentences,wecangettherateoferrorsbymeansofanalyzingthenumberoferrorofeveryT-unit.Theratioofthetotalnumberoferrorfreesentencesinthewholesentencesmakesthewritingaccuracy.Theremaybeavarietyoferrorsforcollegestudentsinacomposition.Thefollowingtable3—1willtakesometypicalexamples.Table3-1CommonErrorsinCompositionerIDrSexamplesSpellingHowever,itsdisadvantagesarealsoveryaparent.ThenegetiveeffectsoftheplasticbagsarefarseriousthanwhatI’vementionedabove. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文VerbtenseFormanyyearswehadbeenusingdisposalplasticbagswhenweareshoppingonthemarket.NumberitcanalsocostsUSalottohavethemdecomposecompletelySOAgreementastominimizetheirdamagetotheenvironment.pluralsit’ShightimethegovernmentissuedstrictIawsandmeasurestostopusingplasticbag.PrepositionsWeshouldtakeinsomemeasuresto⋯WbrdformsItiSunconvenientforUStouse⋯.ArticlesForaninstance,SentencestructureAsweknow,everyonewantstomakeourlifetobebeautifulConjunctionW色shouldtakesomemeasuresbecausewecallmakeOUrworldmorebeautifulandcleaner.2)MeasureofWritingFluencyWritingfluencyiseasierforUStoidentify.Kellogg(1996)divideswritingfluencyintothreecategories:fluencyinformulating,fluencyintranslating,andfluencyinmonitoring.Writingfluencydependsonthelengthofacompositionwithinthestipulatedtime.Larsen—Freeman(1978)claimsthatifastudentownsahigherleverofwritingfluency,也eymayproducemorewordsinthewriting.ThewaytomeasureFluencyistocountthearticles’wordsnumber3)MeasureofWritingCompletenessInthisthesis,writingcompletenessmeansthatthewriterCanwriteanessaywithaproperbeginning,endingandcohesivestructures.Asweallknow,SLlearnersareofteninclinedtowriteanarticlewimpoorcohesion.TheyCanwritesomeparagraphstoexpressthemainmeaning,howevertheCannotconnectthemproperly.Sometimes,theyCanalsonotstartaproperbeginningtolaunchallarticle,or,theyarelackingintheskillstomakeagoodendingtosummarywhatthey’vewritten.Herethecompletenessmeanstotestthestudents’abilitytoorganizeanarticle.AnditalsomeansSLlearners’logicability.30 太原理工大学硕士学位论文4)MeasureoftheWordsDiversityWordsdiversitymeanshowmanydifferentwordscanbeusedinthecomposition.Dothestudentsjustusesimplewordsthey‘velearnedbeforetowritethecomposition?Dotheyhaveanysignificantimprovementafterlearningtheknowledgeoflexicalchunks.Thesequestionswillbesolvedinlaterexperiment.Thewaytomeasurewordsdiversityistomeasurehowmanydifferentwordsthewriteruse.3.3.2.2ReliabilityofEssayTestBeforethepre·testoftheexperiment,thereliabilityoftheessaytaskhasbeeninspectedbySPSS.Theresearcherusesthestatisticsofthepre—testofoneoftheclasstotestthereliabilityofthistask.AndthefollowingtablecomesfromtheSPSSandtheresearcherscangetseveralratiosofCronbachalpha.Fromthetable3.2,weCaD_seethatthereliabilitystatisticsisO.829,whichsuggeststhatthistaskisreliableenoughfortheexperiment.RatiosofCronbachalphaarebetween0and1,andthegreatertheratiosofCronbachalpha,thestrongertheinternalconsistencyandtheresultsofthemeasurementismorereliable.Asweknow,theacceptableminimumoftheratiosofCronbachalphais0.70.Inthisexperiment,theratioofCronbachalphais0.829,whichsuggeststhatthismeasurementisreliableandacceptable.Table3-2ReliabilityAnalysisoftheEssayTaskReliabilityStatisticsCronbach’SAlphaNofItems.8294Table3-3Item—TotalStatisticsofReliabilityAnalysis31 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Item.TotalStatisticsScaleCorrectedCronbach’SScaleMeanifVarianceifItem.TotalAlphaifItemDeletedItemDeletedCorrelationDeletedAccuracy9.3250.532.740.851Fluency8.5500。921。659。849Completenes9.6250.632.699.888SDiversit),9.5750.787.768.7883.3.2.3Data-analysisofPre—testAswhathasbeendiscussed,eachstudentgetsfivescores.Beforetheresearch,theresearchershouldtestifthestudentsinthetwonaturalclasshavedifferent1evelofEnglish.natistosay,theresearchershouldexamineifthescoresofthestudentssuggestasignificantdifferenceaccordingtothetwodifferentclasses.Theresearchappliesone-wayanalysisofvariance(ANOVA)ofSPSStoanalyseiftherearesignificantdifferenceofSCOreSbetweenthestudentsintwodifferentclasses.nefollowingtable3-4isthefinaltablecomingfromSPSS:Table3.4AN0、AofPre.testANOVASumofSquaresdfMeanSquareFSig.AccuracylBetweenGroups。0171.017.072,789WithinGroups13.41758.23lT-otal13.43359F1tientlBetweenGroups.0041.004.053.818WithinGroups4.54258.07832 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Total4.54659CompletenesBetweenGroups.1501.150.863.3571WithinGroups10.08358.174Toml10.23359Diversity1BetweenGroups.0171.017.135.715WithinGroups7.16758.124Total7.18359AllofthestatisticsrepresentingthesignificanceareaboveO.05,whichmeansthatthereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenthetwoclassstudents.Thisistotallygoodfortheexperimentandonlyonthisbasiscantheresearcherstartresearching.3.3.3TeachingApproachesAppliedinEachClassAccordingtowhattheauthorhassaidabove,wecailknowthattheexperimentalandcontrolclassesareundertheinstructionofsameteacherwiththesametextbookbut、杭也twodifferentteachingapproaches.AccordingtOlexicalapproachofLewisandtheoriesoflanguageteachingandprocessing,theresearcherdividesthewholeteachingofexperimentalclassintofoursteps.HeretheresearcherwouldliketotakeunitoneofNewHorizonCollegeEnglish1asanexampleasfollowing.ThetitleofunitoneisLearningAForeignLanguage.3.3.3.1TeachingMethodAdoptedintheExperimentalClassStepone:BeforeReadingBeforeanalysingandteachingthewholetext,theteacherassignsseveralquestionsforstudentstodiscusstogether.ThesequestionsarecloselyrelatedwiththethemeofLeamingAForeignLanguageandthepremiseisthatallofthestudentshavepreparedthelessonbeforetheclass.Herearethequestions:1)WhendidthespeakerstarttolearnEnglish,andwhendidhegaincommandofthe33 太原理工大学硕士学位论文language?2)Besidesthelanguageitself,whatelsedidthespea:kergainfromlearninglanguageonline?3)HowcouldonlinelearninghelpyouwithyourEnglish?Thesequestionsalesupposedtobediscussedbystudentswhohavebeendividedintogroups.Everygroupselectaleadertoanswerthequestionsandtalkthemaboutatthebeginningoftheclass.StepTwo:OverallReadingInthispart,theteacheraimsathelpingstudentsunderstandtheframeworkandstructureofthewholetext.Theteacherissupposedtoasksomequestionsaboutstructuresofthisarticle.1)Howdoesthisarticlebegin?Whichparagraphsaretheopening?2)Howisthebodyofthearticlearranged?31Howistheconclusionmade?41Findoutsomecohesivewords.Duringthisstep,theteacherisresponsibleforthestudentstounderstandtheoverallstructureofthewholetext.Atthesametime,theteachershouldhelpstudentstofindOutwhatsupportstheauthor’Sopinionsandwhatisthethesisstatement.Onlybythiswaycanstudentsunderstandthes缸11cnlreofthearticleandhowtoorganizeanarticle.Afterlearningtheknowledgeoflexicalchunks,studentswillknowthattheseexpressionsthatbuildthewholestructurealealsoal(indoflexicalchunks.StepFour:DetailedReadingIIltheexperimentalclass,thelexicalapproach,namely,thelexicalchunksarethemainfactorofteaching.Asaresult,theteachingiscloselyrelatedtolexicalchunks.Thefollowingisthespecificcontentofteaching.1)IdentifyLexicalChunksAttheverybeginning,theknowledgeoflexicalchunkshasbeentaughtbytheteachertothestudentsintheexperimentalclass.Theyaretaughtthedefinitionandclassificationoflexicalchunks.Allofthestudentsintheexperimentalclassaleaskedtopreparethelessonbeforetheclassandduringthepreparation,theyareaskedto14 太原理工大学硕士学位论文markthelexicalchunksofthearticle.T11isprocessrequiresstudentstoapplytheirknowledgeoflexicalchunksandtheirEnglishskillswithrelatedbackgroundknowledge.TllisCanalsoenhancetheawarenessoflexicalchunksofthestudentsintheexperimentalclassandpavethewayforthelexicalchunksteaching.Afterthestudentshavefoundoutthelexicalchunksinthearticle,theteacheranalyzesthewholetextpointingoutthelexicalchunksineveryparagraph.Inordertobespecific,theteachersisalsosupposedtopointoutwhichcategorythelexicalchunksbelongto.Thatistosay,thepremiseofthisstepisthattheteachercanidentifythelexicalchunksinthetextbeforetheclass.Inthisexperiment,theresearcheradoptstheartificialmethodofrecognizingthelexicalchunks.TherearetwoEnglishteacherswhoproficientlymastertheknowledgeoflexicalchunksdeterminingwhichlexicalchunksaretogether.2)PracticinglexicalchunksAfteridentilyingthelexicalchunks,studentsaresupposedtopracticethelexicalchunksduringandaftertheclass.Let’Stakeunitoneasanexample.Studentslearnalotoflexicalchunks.Theresearcherwouldliketogivesomeexamplesasfollows.”Althoughattimeslearningalanguagewasfrustrating,itwaswellworththeeffort””⋯itrequiresalotoftime,commitmentanddisciplinetokeepupwiththeflowofthecourse.。’”Onceinawhile,Icriedoutoffrustration,andsometimesIfeltlikegivingup.””Therehavebeenupsanddownswithmyonlinelearning.””Isoongotaccesstothenecessaryequipment,learnedhowtousethetechnologyfromafriendandparticipatedinthevirtualclassroom5todaysaweek.””NowthatIspeakaforeignlanguage,insteadofstaringintospacewhenEnglishisbeingspoken,ICallparticipateandmakefriends.””IalTlabletoreachouttoothersandbridgethegapbetweenmy!anguageandcultureand也eirs.””Notonlydidlearninganotherlanguageteachmethevalueofhardwork,butitalsogavemeinsightsintoanotherculture,andmymindWasopenedtonewwaysof气E 太原理工大学硕士学位论文seeingthings.”Alloftheaboveexamplesincludesomeofthelexicalchunksinunitone.Somet11atarenotmarkedarealsolexicalchunks.Theresearchermarksthosethatalenewtostudentsonly.Afterlearningthose,studentspracticetheminandafterclass.Intheclass,teachersaskstudentstomakesentencesbyusingthenewlylearnedlexicalchunksandmakeupshortarticlesbyusingarticlebuilderswhichalsobelongtolexicalchunks.Forexample,studentsareaskedtomakesentencesbyusing”getaccessto”:StudentA:Nowadays,collegestudentscangetaccesstoalotofwebsites.StudentB:Whatwecangetaccesstointhiscityisthelibraryofthisuniversity.Atthesametime,studentsareaskedtotranslatebyusinglexicalchunksinthearticle.Forexample:1)如今,越来越多的人可以利用互联网查找他们需要的信息。(练习haveaccessto)2)对于网络课程,学生不仅可以选择何时何地学习,在回答问题之前他们还可以有时间思考答案。(练习notonly.一butalso⋯)3)既然我们已经学完这门课程,就应该多做些复习。(练习nowthat)4)人生路很长,每个人都会经历很多不同的故事,每个人的生活都充满了起起伏伏。(练习upsanddowns)5)作为一班之长,汤姆的职责就是成为联系同学和老师的纽带。(练习bridgethegapbetween)6)只要能得到父亲和母亲的同意,她就答应他的求婚,并去巴黎举行一场浪漫的婚礼。(练习aslongaS)7)你明天必须十点之前把老师布置的作业交给我。(练习withoutfail)8)请允许我加入你们郊游的队伍,我对这次活动非常感兴趣。(练习morethan)Aftertheclass,allofthestudentsintheexperimentalclassareaskedtomakesentencesbyusingeverynewlylearnedlexicalchunks.Theteachercollectstheassignmentandcorrectseverypieceofassignmeminordertogiveeverystudentsafeedback.StepFour:AfterReading气6 太原理工大学硕士学位论文1)AccumulationoflexicalchunksTherearelexicalchunkseverywhereintheNewHorizonCollegeEnglish.WhileStudentsareaskedtolookforlexicalchunksinthepassageA,theyarealsorequiredtofmdoutlexicalchunksinpassageBandexercises.Allofthelexicalchunksarerequiredtoberememberedbystudentsinexperimentalclass.Theteachercheckstheassignmenteverytwoweeksandgiveascoreaccordingtoeachstudent’Slevelofassignment,whichwillinfluencestheirfinalscoresofthissemester.Thisisawaytomotivatethestudentstofinishassignmentandfollowtheteacher’Sinstruction.2)ApplicationofLexicalChunksAfterinputtingSOmuchknowledgeoflexicalchunksduringclass,studentsarealsorequiredtooutputlexicalchunksafterclass.Aftereveryunitisfinished,studentsareaskedtomakeupastorybyusingthelexicalchunksinthatunit.ThisiscompletelyallefficientwaytoconsolidatetheknowledgeoflexicalchunksamongthestudentsoftheexperimentalclassMakingupstoriesandhavingdiscussioningroupsCallhelpstudentsincreaseinterestandenthusiasmofEnglishlearningandfllrtherhelpthemimprovetheirlanguageskillsintheaspectofaccuracy,fluencyanddiversityofvocabularies.Forexample,thereareseverallexicalchunksinunitone.Studentsareaskedtomakeupastorybyusingthem.Thefollowingisonestorythatoneofthestudentsintheexperimentalclasswrite.”AstheIntemetbecomesmoreandmorepopular,mostofushaveaccesstotheelectricresources.InordertomakewelluseoftheIntemet,weshouldcommunicatevvitllfriendsontheIntemetwell.Eventhoughitisnoteasyforsomestudents,theyshouldnotgiveup.Nowthattheyhaveaccesstotheelectricresources,theyshouldspendmoretimeonitandtakeadvantageofit.”Intheaboveparagraph,thisstudentshavepracticedthefollowinglexicalchunks:moreandmore,haveaccesstOcommunicatewith,Eventhough,giveUP,spend⋯on,takeadvantageof.Afterthispractice,itisbelievesthatthestudentshaveenhancedtheirmemoryoftheselexicalchunks.So,teachersassignthiskindofhomeworkaftereachunitSOthat37 太原理工大学硕士学位论文thestudentscallnoticeandrecitelexicalchunkswell.3.3.3.2.TeachingMethodAdoptedintheControlClassStudentsinthecontrolclassaretaughtbythetraditionalapproachofteachingwithoutmentioningwhatislexicalchunksoranyotherknowledgeaboutlexicalchunks.Stepone:PreparationfortheclassTheSmdentsinthecontrolclassarcalsorequiredtopreparefortheclassbeforetheteacheranalyseit.Thestudentsalerequiredtoreadandunderstandthearticlewithlook叩newwordsinthedictionary.Thesamequestionsarealsoaskedbytheteacherstotheexperimentalclass:1)WhendidthespeakerslarttolearnEnglish,andwhendidhegainconllnandofthelanguage?2)Besidesthelanguageitself,whatelsedidthespeakergainfromlearninglanguageonline?3)HowcouldonlinelearninghelpyouwithyourEnglish?StepTwo:OverallreadingInthisstep,theteacheralsoasksthestudentsinthecontrolclasstoidentifyhowmanypartsthearticlearedividedinto.Studentsaresupposedtosummarizetheoverallmeaningofeachpart.Thisstepaimsatguidingthestudentstounderstandthearticlefromaglobalperspective.StepThree:DetailedreadingThisstepinthecontrolclassisquitedifferentfromthatintheexperimentalclass·Knowledgeoflexicalchunksisnotmentionedduringthewholeteaching.Theteachertranslatesthearticleparag印hbyparagraph.Duringanalyzingthetext,theteacherisalsosupposedtoteachtheimportantandusefulphrasesandsentencesinatraditionalway,suchasmakingsentencesandcomparingsynonymsandantonyms.Forexample,thereisaphrasethatis”attimes”intheparagraphoneofLearningAForeignLanguage.Theteacherintroducesittothestudentsfirstandthenmakessomesentencesbyusing’’attimes”,suchas:1R 太原理工大学硕士学位论文IoftenhavemealsinthedinningroomsofourcampusandattimesIeatout.Hegetsclosetowildlifeattimes,butonlywhentheanimalscometohim.Hostfamilymembers,pleaserealizethatweChinesearealittlemorereservedattimesthansomeofyourotherfriends,SObesurenottomistakethisfordispleasureonourpart.Foranotherexample:W11ile”inthearticleiSintroducedtointroduceinformationthatcontrastswithwhatisconveyedinthemainclause.TheteacherCanguidestudentstolearntOusethiswordappropriately.Theteacherasksthestudentstotranslatesentencesbyusing”while1)在东部的大学设备比较好,在西部的大学相对简陋些。2)一些客人行为得体有礼貌,一些则比较粗鲁不讲究。3)我们之前的老师对学生非常的耐性,现在的新老师则动不动责罚学生。4)在中国,现在的南方细雨纷纷,北方却飘着鹅毛大雪。5)理科生沉浸在数字的海洋里徜徉,文科生则游离于文字的宝库里。Theseapproachesaimatenhancingtheusageoftheimportantphrasesandsentencesinthetextsforstudentsinthecontrolclass.Everyparagraphisanalysedinthisway:translatingandintroducingnewandimportantwordsandphrasesandthenaskingstudentstopracticethesephrasestohelpimprovetheirlevelofvocabulary.StepThree:After-ClassassignmentAfterclass,theteacheralsoassignshomeworkrelatedtothetext.Thestudentsareaskedtorecitethenewwordsandphrases.Lettheauthortakeunitoneastheexampleagain.Therearequitemanynewandimportantwordsandphrasesinunitone,suchas:Playarolein⋯/Be/becomeawareof.../Inaddition/Reflecton/Befinishedwith⋯/Onsb.’Spart/onthepartofsth./Remindsb.ofsth./Catchup(with)/Attimes/notonly...butalso⋯/getaccessto/feellikedoingsth./comeacross/reapthebenefits/givesb.Insightsinto/nowthat/reachoutto/nowthat/insteadof/tradeforandSOon.Atthesametime,thestudentsarealsoaskedtofinishtheafter-classexercisesandtheteacheranalysessomeofthedifficultitemsspecially.39 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Besides,studentsareaskedtorecitethesephrasesandwordsandwillbecheckedthenextclassbydictating.Alloftheteachingmaterialsandthetextbooksofboththeexperimentalclassandthecontrolclassarethesameandtheirclasshoursarealsothesamelong.Besides,thereareseveralafter-classexercisesintheNewHorizonEnglish1,whichcontainssentencestructurepracticingandtranslation.Thesetwokindsofexercisesareadvantageousforstudentstopracticelexicalchunks.Asaresult,theteacheranalysistheseexerciseswi也twodifferentapproachestothetwodifferentclasses.UnitoneisstilltheexampleTranslationexercisescontainbothEnglish—ChinesetranslationandChinese—Englishtranslation.HerearethreeoftheitemsofChinese—EnglishtranslationandthreeoftheitemsofEnglish-Chinesetranslation:1)既然我们已经学完这门课程,就应该多做些复习。2)与以英语为母语的人交谈是有益的体验,从中我们能学到很多东西。3)他让她放弃工作在家照看孩子,但是她觉得这个要求太过分了。4】一想到这些年有的男孩和女孩被父母强迫沿街讨钱我就生气。5)当她要关掉音乐时,她父亲冲进她的房间,朝着她喊道:“难道你不能把音乐调小一点?1)insteadofonlywritingcomposRionsaboutthesubjectsthatyourteacherhasgivenyou,dosomethingenjoyable,likewritingemailstoafriend.2)Englishisnotonlythemostusefullanguageintheworld,butitisalsooneoftheeasiestlanguagestolearnandtouse.3)Distancelearningcoursesarecoursesinwhichtheinstructorcommunicates、Ⅳi也studentsusingcomputertechnology.Intheexperimentalclass,theteacherasksthestudentsintheexperimentalclasstofindoutthelexicalchunksofeachsentencefirst.Then/既然/交谈/放弃/强迫/关掉/调小/insteadof/notonly⋯butalso⋯/communicate埘tllarepickedout.,whichCanhelpenhancethestudents’awarenessoflexicalchunksandrememberthemmoreclearlyanddeeply.Inthecontrolclass,theteacherasksthestudentsinthecontrolclasstotranslate40 太原理工大学硕士学位论文thesentencesdirectlyandemphasizethefixedphrases,suchas/既然/交谈/放弃强迫/关掉/调小/insteadof/notonly⋯butalso⋯/communicatewith.3.3.3.3ABriefSummaryoftheTeachingWhilethestudentsintheexperimentalgrouparetaughtwiththe‘‘noticingandmemorizinghypothesis(Schmidt,1983)”,andvvithadetailedintruductionontheknowledgeoflexicalchunks,thestudentsinthecontrolclassaretaughtwiththetraditionalteachingapproachwithoutknowinganythingabouttheknowledgeoflexicalchunks.Atthesametime,theteacherencouragesthestudentsintheexperimentalclasstobeartheselexicalchunksinmindandtotrytoemploythemintheirwriting.Thetimespanoftheexperimentlastsforsixteenweeks,whichisonewholesemester.3.3.4Post-testaftertheExperimentApost-testisdesignedtoinvestigatewhetherthereisanysignificantdifferenceofthestudents’grammarabilitybetweentheexperimentalclassandcontrolclass,andwhetherthereisanysignificantdifferencewithineachofthetwoclassafteroneterm.Thepost-testisthesanqeessaytaskasthatofthepre—test.ItisadministeredtobothofthetwoclassesinWeek17.Itisaveryimportanttest.Becauseitnotonlyinspectstheresultsofthetrainingafterasemesterbutalsotestifiestheresearcher’Shypotheses.Thesametothepre—test,the60studentsinbothexperimentalandcontrolclassarerequiredtofinishthewritingtaskwithin30minutsandthenumberofwordsshouldbeabove250.Duringthewriting,allofthe60studentsareforbiddentOuseadictionaryoranyotherreferences.Justlikethepre—test,eachstudents’writingisjudgedaccordingtOthefollowingfouraspects:accuracy,fluency,completenessandlanguagediversity.Thefollowingchapterwilldiscusstheresultsindetails. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文42 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ChapterFourResultsandDiscussions4.1ComparisonwithinEachClassAfterasemester’Slearningandtraining,allofthestudentsaresupposedtogainsomeimprovement.So,theirscoresofpre·testandpost·testarecomparedwithineachclass.TheresearcherappliesthePairedSamplesTesttotestifthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweenthepre—testandpost·testofeachclass.4.1.1ComparisonwithintheControlClassAtthebeginning,theresearchertestsifthereisanyimprovementforthestudentsinthecontrolclass.Thefollowingtable5-1isthecomparisonofthemeanvaluesofeachitembetweenthepre—testandpost·test.Allofthesevaluesofthefouraspectsincreaseaccordingtothetable.Themeanvalueofaccuracyrisesfrom3.07to3.250Themeanvalueoffluencyrisesfrom3.800to3.917.Themeanvalueofcompletenessrisesfrom2.783to3.116.Themeanvalueofdiversityrisesfrom2.800to3.050.Eventhoughallofthestatisticsareincreased,thesignificancedifferencesbetweenthemareunknowll.So,theresearcherdoesaPairedSamplesTesttotestiftherearesignificantdifferencesbetweenthepre·—testandpost·-testwithinthecontrolclassTable4-1MeanValuesComparisonwithintheControlClassMeRnPair1Accuracyl3.017Accuracy23.250Pair2Fluecyl3.80043 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Fluency23.917Pair3Completenes2.783s1Completenes3.116s2Pair4Diversityl2.800Diversity23.050Table4-2PairedSamplesTestwithintheControlClassPairedSamplesTesttdfSig.(2-tailed)Pair1Accuracyl-Accuracy2.2.72829.011Pair2Fluecyl—Fluency2.1.75629.090Pair3Completeness1-.4.81729.000Completeness2Pair4Diversityl‘_—。.3.18129.003Diversity2Fromthistable,theresearcherlearnsthattherearesignificantdifferencesattheaspectofaccuracy,completenessanddiversitywhiletherearenosignificantdifferencesattheaspectoffluency.Astheresult,theresearcherCanconcludethatafteronesemester,thestudentsinthecontrolclasshaveimprovetheirEnglishskillsfromtheaspectofaccuracy,completenessanddiversitywhiletheydonothaveasignificantimprovementonfluencyofwriting. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文4.1.2ComparisonwithintheExperimentalClassAtthebeginning,theresearchertestsifthereisanyimprovementforthestudentsintheexperimentalclass.Thefollowingtable4-3isthecomparisonofthemeanvaluesofeachitembetweenthepre-testandpost—test.Allofthesevaluesofthefouraspectsincreaseaccordingtothetable.Themeanvalueofaccuracyrisesfrom3.047to3.500.Themeanvalueoffluencyrisesfrom3.813to3.891.Themeanvalueofcompletenessrisesfrom2.718to3.578.Themeanvalueofdiversityrisesfrom2.781to3.390.Eventhoughallofthestatisticsincrease,thesignificancedifferencesbetweenthemareunknown.So,thePairedSamplesTestisdonetotestifthereaYesignificantdifferencesbetweenthepre-testandpost-testwithintheexperimentalclass.Table4-3MeanValuesComparisonwithintheExperimentalClassMearlPair1Aceuracyl3.047Accuracy23.500Pair2Fluecyl3.813Fluecy23.89lPair3Completenes2.718s1Completenes3.578s2Pair4Diversityl2.781Diversity3.39045 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Table4-4PairedSamplesTestwithintheExperimentalClassPairedSamplesTesttdfSig.(2-tailed)Pair1Accuracyl—Accuracy2.5.98831.000Pair2Fluecyl-Fluency2.1.53931.】34Pair3Completenessl——11.96531.000Completeness2Pair4Diversityl‘_——.9.18431.000Diversity2Fromthetable4-4above,theresearcherCalllearnthatintheexperimentalclass,therearesignificantdifferencesattheaspectofaccuracy,completenessanddiversitywhilethereareDosignificantdifferenceattheaspectoffluency,whichisthesametothecontrolclass.Astheresult,theresearchercanconcludethatafteronesemester,thestudentsintheexpefimentflclasshaveimprovetheirEnglishskillsfromtheaspectofaccuracy’completenessanddiversitywhiletheydonothaveasignificantimprovementonfluencyofwriting.4.2ComparisonbetweentheExperimentalandControlClassAswhathasbeendiscussedabove,inthepre-test,allofthestatisticssuggestthatthesignificancebetweentheexperimentalclassandcontrolclassareabove0.05,whichmeansthattherearenosignificantdifferencebetweenthetwoclassstudents.OnlyonthisbasisCantheresearcherstartresearching. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Table4-5MeanValuesComparisoninthePost·testbetweentheTwoClassDescriptivesStd.NMeanDeviationStd.ErrorAccuruacyExperimental303.250.5043.09212classControlclass303.500.4152.0758Tbtal603.375.4750.0613Fluency2Experimental303.917.2306.0421classControlclass303.900.2034.0371Total603.908.2157.0279CompletenExperimental303.1167.36397.06645ess2classControlclass303.6000.35719.06521Total603.3583.43269.05586Diversity2Experimental303.0500.33088.06041classControlclass303.4000.33218.06065Total603.2250.37309.04817Fromthetable4-5above,theresearchercanknowthatthemeanvaluesofthefouraspectsal"ehigheroftheexperimentalclassthanthatofthecontrolclass.Butwhetherthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweenthemareunknown.So,theSalTletest(One—WayANOVA)isdonetotestifthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweentheexperimentalandcontrolclass.47 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Table4.6ANOVA2ofthePost.testANOVASumofSquaresdfMeanSquareFSig.Accuracy2BetweenGroups.9381.9384.394.040WithinGroups12.37558.213Total13.31359Fluency2BetweenGroups,0041.004.088。768WithinGroups2.74258.047Total2.74659CompletenesBetweenGroups3.50413.50426.949.000s2WithinGroups7.54258.130Total11.04659Diversity2BetweenGroups1.83811.83816.718,000WithinGroups6.37558.11CFromthetable4-6above,itisCallbeknownthatvalueofsignificanceofaccuracyis0.040,fluencyis0.768,completenessis0.000anddiversityisO.000.Thatistosay,aftertheexperiment,therearesignificantdifferencesbetweenthecontrolclassandexperimentalclassattheaspectsofaccuracy,completenessanddiversitywhiletherearenotanysignificantdifferencesattheaspectoffluency.4.3QualitativeAnalysisoftheResultsWhilethedataaleanalysedthroughquatitativeapproachbySPSS,theyarealsoanalysedthroughqualitativeapproach.Casesareanalysedafterthewholeexperimem. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文Theresearchercomparesthepre··testandpost·-testwithinonestudentintheexperimentalclassandfindsthattherearemuchmorelexicalchunksintheirpost·testandthewordsdiversityofthepost—testismuchmoresignificantthanthatinthepre-test.Forexample,studentAintheexperimentalclassapplied22lexicalchunksinthepost·testwhileheapplied12lexicalchunksinhispre-test.Atthesametime,itismoreaccurateinthepost—testthanthepre-test.Atthesametime,casesfromexperimentalclassandcontrolclassarecomparedinthepost-test.Itisimpliedthatcasesfromtheexperimentalclassappliedmorelexicalchunksthanthecasesinthecontrolclass.Forexample,oneofthestudentsinthecontrolclassapplied13lexicalchunkswhileanotherintheexperimentalclassapplied23lexicalchunks.Therearealsomoreerrorsinthecontrolclass.Oneofthecasesmade9mistakesinthecontrolclasswhileonemade2mistakesintheexperimentalclass.Asaresult,theresearcherCalllearnthatlexicalchunkscallbetaughtandacquired.Itcanhelpimprovetheabilityofaccuracyandwordsdiversity.Thestudentsintheexperimentalclassmakeprogressinmanyaspects.4.4SummaryandDiscussionTosumup,throughtheanalysisofdata,theresearcherCancometoaconclusionthattheoverallresultisinconformitywitlltheresearchers’hypothesis.Atthesametime,thedataalsohelpsolvetheproblemsthatareputforwardbeforetheexperiment.Theauthorsummarizestheresultsasfollows:Atfirst,beforetheexperiment,thetestforpre—testandpost—testistestedtoexamineifitisreliable.Accordingtothedata,theresearcherknowsitsratioofCronbach。SMphais0.829.Astheresult,thetestCanbeusedtotestthesubjects,whichmeansthetestiSscientificandreliable.Thesecond,accordingtothedatathatisdrawnfromaone-wayanalysisofvariance(ANOVA),theresearcherCangettheideathattherearenosignificantdifferencesbetweentheexperimentalclassandcontrolclass,whichmeansthatallof49 太原理工大学硕士学位论文thestatisticsofthefouraspects(accuracy,fluency,completenessandvocabularydiversity)representingthesignificanceareabove0.05.Onlyonthisbasiscalltheresearcherstallthenextstep.Thethird,afterawholesemester,theresearchdoesatesttoexamineifthereareanydifferenceswitlleachclass.TheresearcherappliesthePairedSamplesTesttotestifthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweenthepre-testandpost-testofeachclass.Thefinaldatasuggestthatnomatterintheexperimentalclassandinthecontrolclass,themeanvaluesofeachaspect(accuracy,fluency,completenessandvocabularydiversity)goup.Thatistosay,ingeneral,thestudentsinboththeexperimentalclassandthecontrolclassgaincertainimprovementoftheirgrammarability.However,afteraPairedSamplesTest,theresearcherfindsoutthatnotallthefouraspects(accuracy,fluency,completenessandvocabularydiversity)inthecontrolandtheexperimentalclassshowsignificantdifferences.Theybothhaveasignificantdifferenceattheaspectofaccuracy,completenessandvocabularydiversity,whiletheaspectoffluencyinboththeexperimentalclassandthecontrolclassshowsnosignificantdifference.Astheresult,theresearchercanmakeaconclusionthatallthestudentsinthetwoclassesimprovetheirgrammaraccuracy.Atthesametime,theyCanbuildanarticlemorecomplete,whichmeanstheycanmakeabetterbeginningandendwitllbettercohesivestructures.TheyCanalsotakeadvantagesofmorenewwordsintheiroutput.However,theirlengthofoutputimprovesbutwithoutasignificantimprovement.Atlast,afterthepost-test,theexperimentalclassandthecontrolclassarealsocompared.Atthebeginning,themeanvaluesofthesetwoclassesatthefouraspectsarecompared.Accordingtothedata,theresearchercanknowthatthemeanvaluesofthefouraspectsarehi曲eroftheexperimentalclassthanthatofthecontrolclass.Butwhetherthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweenthemareunknown.So,thesametest(One—WayANOVA)isdonetotestifthereareanysignificantdifferencesbetweentheexperimentalandcontrolclass.Theresultshowsthattherearesignificantdifferencesbetweenthecontrolclassandexperimentalclassattheaspectsofaccuracy,completenessanddiversitywhiletherearenotanysignificantdifferencesattheaspect50 太原理工大学硕士学位论文offluency.Thatistosay,theeffectsofthesetwodifferentteachingmethodsaredifferent.Thelexicalchunksapproachissignificantlybetterthanthetraditionalteachingapproach.Becausethestudentsintheexperimentalclassgainamoresignificantimprovementonthegrammarabilitythanthestudentsinthecontrolclass. 太原理工大学硕士学位论文52 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ChapterFiveMajorFindingsandImplications5.1MajorfindingsThepresentresearchsetsouttoinvestigatetheinfluencesofthetrainingofnoticingandmemorizinglexicalchunksonthegrammarabilityoffreshmenofacollege.Inthisresearch,twonaturalclassesfromGrade2012,TaiyuanUniversityofTechnology,havebeenobservedintermsoftherelationshipbetweenthelearningandemploymentoflexicalchunksandtheabilityoftheirgrammar.Atthesametime,theresearcheralsotestifiesthehypothesesbeforetheexperiment.Theresearchoffersanopportunitytotestthetrendofthesubjects’grammarabilitybasedontheobtainedresearchdata,andtotestiflexicalchunksCanbetaughtinarealclassaccordingtothescoresbeforeandaftertheexperiment.Thedatacollectedfromtheresearchprovethatlexicalchunksshowpositiveinfluenceonstudents’grammarability,suchaswritingfluency,completenessandaccuracyandSOon.Thefollowingisthemajorfindingsofthisexperimentaccordingtothedatacollectedfromtheexperiment.1)LexicalchunksCallbetaughtinarealclass,whichprovesLewis’theory(1993).Accordingtotheanalysisofthedataofthepost-test,theresearcherCaneasilyconcludethattheuseoflexicalchunkswidelyexistsinthestudents’essaysoftheexperimentalclasswhiletheyarelessdiverseintheessaysofthecontrolclass.Theabilityofusinglexicalchunksisenhancedthroughseveraldifferentways.Oneofthemistoraisetheawarenessoflexicalchunksofthestudentsintheexperimentalclass.Duringtheexperiment,theteacherkeepsremindingthestudentsintheexperimentalclasstopickoutthelexicalchunksinthetextandexercises.Atthesametime,theteacherassignhomeworkrelatedtolexicalchunks.Allofthoseactionsarehelpfultoraisetheawarenessoflexicalchunksintheexperimentalclass.Apartfromthese,theteacher’Scheckingoftherecitingworkofthestudentscanalsohelpenhancethemasteringoflexicalchunksbythestudents53 太原理工大学硕士学位论文2)Masteringandemployinglexicalchunksisanessentiallanguagelearningstrategy.LexicalchunkscanhelpsettlethecomplicatedproblemsthelearnersencounterinSLA.Undertheinstructionwithoutlexicalchunks,thestudentsmaycomeacrossalotofproblemssuchaspoorvocabularydiversity,pooraccuracyandnotknowinghowtoorganizeaarticle.However,aswhathasbeenshownintheexperiment,thestudentsundertheinstructionoflexicalapproachperformsignificantlybetteratthoseaspects.Astheresult,theresearcherCangaintheideathattheapproachoflexicalchunksisanimportantandusefulstrategyforEnglishlearning.3)Knowledgeoflexicalchunksisembodied、vitllmorepowerforthequalityofthelearners’grammarabilitythanstructuralrulesoflanguage.AsNattinger&DeCarrico(1992)haveclaimed,lexicalchunkswhichexistbetweengrammarandlexismayplayakeyroleinlanguageteachingandhaveagreatinfluenceonlanguagelearning.Inthisexperiment,theresearcherteststhegrammarabilityfromthefouraspects:accuracy,fluency,completenessandvocabularydiversityofwriting.Astheanalysisofthedataabove,theresearcherfindsoutthatknowledgeoflexicalchunksCanhelpthestudentsimprovetheirgrammarabilitysignificantlyfromavarietyofaspects.TheycanapplyEnglishmoreaccurate,fluentandcompletewithmorediversewords.So,theresearchercaneasilyconcludethatknowledgeoflexicalchunkscallbeanefficientwaytolearnaforeignlanguage.5.2ImplicationsofPedagogyandLearningStrategy5.2.1ImplicationsforTeachers1)LearningKnowledgeofLexicalChunksAswhathasbeengainedfromtheexperiment,theresearcherfindsoutthatknowledgeoflexicalchunksisbeneficialforthestudents’grammarability.Itiswidelyknownthatteachersplayaveryimportantroleinstudents’learning,especiallylearningofaforeignlanguage.Inordertoenhancethegrammarabilityofstudents 太原理工大学硕士学位论文better,teachersareresponsibleforlearningknowledgeoflexicalchunksthemselvesfirstandapplythemintoclasses.Thisisindispensableandbeneficialforbothstudentsandteaching.2)Applyingknowledgeoflexicalchunksinclasses.Theremaybealotofwaystoteachlexicalchunkstostudents.TheresearcherCalllearnsomeofthemfromtheexperiment.Inthebeginning,inordertohelpstudentslearnlexicalchunks,teachersshouldintroducelexicalchunksindetails.Asaresult,thedefinition,categories,usageandwaystoidentifyareindispensableforteacherstointroducetostudents.Afterintroducingthebasicdetails,teachershelpthempracticeandsuperviseandurgethemtoreciteandemploylexicalchunks.Teachersmayaskthemtokeeprepeatedreadingandtextmemorization.Atthesametime,teacherscanaskstudentspickoutlexicalchunksfromtextsandaiter-classexercises.Thenteachersassigntaskstohelpstudentstopracticeandrecitelexicalchunks.Whileteachersrequirestudentstoprctice,teachersshouldkeepmentioningthatlexicalchunksareusedincontexts.Thatistosay,teachersshouldraisestudents’awarenessoflexicalchunksandmakeknowledgeoflexicalchunksbeaindispensablepartoftheirlanguageteaching.3)EncouragingstudentstoapplylexicalchunksactivelyTeachersmayencouragelearnerstotakeriskinproductivelyapplyinglexicalchunkstheyhaveacquired.Swain(1985)claimedL2leamersdonotnecessarilypickupmanyfeaturesintheirinput,thereforetheyneedpushingbyothersandaskingbytutorstoapplywhattheyhavelearnedintheiroutput.So,eventhoughstudentshavegainedalotofknowledgeoflexicalchunks,theyalsoneedmotivationtousethemintheiroutput,whichrequiresteacherstoencouragethemto.HerearesomedetailedwaystoencouragestudentstoapplylexicalchunksintheirdailyEnglishlearning.Beforeeachclass,teachersCanaskstudentstopreviewthewholetextandpick5S 太原理工大学硕士学位论文outthelexicalchunksinthetext.Duringtheclass,theyareaskedtodiscusstheiranswersingroups.ThentheteacherCallgivethemthecorrectanswerenenhancetheirmemoriesoflexicalchunks.Aftereachclass,teachersshouldassigncertainhomeworkforstudentstopracticelexicalchunksthathavebeentaughtintheclass,suchasawritingassignmentortranslationassignmentthatrequirestudentstousinglexicalchunkstofinishthem.Thentheteacherscanexamineifthestudentshaverecitedthelexicalchunksthathavebeentaughtbeforewell.Iftheyperformwell.Theycangethighermarksinthefinalexamandiftheydon"t,theylosecertainmarks,whichisinordertoencouragestudentstoapplylexicalchunksactively.41CombiningvocabularyandgrammartogetherThe”grammar”heremeansdifferentfromthethesistitle,whichisanarrowsense.Itmeansthestructuresoflanguageorlanguagebuildingrules.Afterlearningtheknowledgeoflexicalchunks,teachersshoulddefytheviewthatvocabularyandgrammararetotallyunrelatedandtheybelongtotwocompletelyseparatesystems.Itislexicalchunksthatcombinevocabularyandgram.martogether,whichisfirmlybelievedbyNattinger&Decarrico(1992)whoperceivethatlexicalchunksarelocatedbetweenvocabularyandgrammarsomewhere.Mostsignificantly,researchersclaimthatL2learnersaresupposedtoapplylexicalchunksasinputandstorelexicalchunksasawholepart.TheyCanderivebothgrammaticalandmorphologicalrulesfromlexicalchunks.Willis(1999)suggeststhattheteachersshouldencouragelanguagelearnerstoleamaforeignlanguageinsuchawaySOastofacilitatedevelopmentandformarelativecompletesystemofthetargetlanguage.Inaword,grammarandvocabularyshouldbecombinedtogether.5)PursuingprofessionaldevelopmentAccordingtothisexperiment,theresearcherfindsoutthattheapproachoflexicalchunksisbetterthanthecommonapproach.Thatistosay,commonteachingsarenotperfectandteachersstillhavelargespacetOimproveteachingsandgainprofessionaldevelopment.Teachers’professionaldevelopmentistheresultofpursuitofbetterteachingoutcome.Ifteachersmakemistakesofusinglexicalchunks,studentswillbe56 太原理工大学硕士学位论文influenced,too.Manyteachersthemselvesmaymisuselexicalchunkssometimeswithoutawareness.Inordertoachieveabetterteachingoutcome,teachersshouldneverstopself-trainingoftheirteachingskillsandrenewingteachingmethodologies.Besides,eventhoughitisimportanttoteachlexicalchunkstOstudents,itisnotthesoloapproachtoteach.Teachersshouldbegoodatlookingfordifferentefficientwaytoimproveteachingoutcomes.5.2.2ImplicationsforStudentsFirstofall,Itisquiteessentialforthestudentstobecomeawareofthericheximenceoflexicalchunksandtakeadvantagesoflexicalchunkstodevelopstrategiesforlanguageacquisition.Atthesametime,theyshouldalsoknowthatlexisarenottotallyunrelatedtogrammarandrealizethatwordsdonotoccurinisolationbutincombinationwithotherwords.whichmeansthattheawarenessoftheexistenceoflexicalchunkscarlhelpbuildaefficientlearningstrategy,whichwillinturnfacilitateactualcommunicationandreduceprocessingtimeandburdenonthepartofbothlistenersandspeakers.Then,studentsshouldbeexposedinsufficientauthenticlanguagematerials.Itiswidelyknownthatcollegestudentsaremuchmorefreethanmiddleschoolstudents.So,autonomouslearningincollegeisstronglyencouraged.Inordertofosterthestudents’awarenessandincreasetheirstorageoflexicalchunks,theyneedlongtermexposuretoauthenticEnglishmaterials.Becausetheclasstimeislimitedincollegeandtherearemillionsoflexicalchunksthatitisimpossibleforteacherstoteachthemalltostudents.Asaresult.1argequantityofinputoflexicalchunksinauthenticlanguageisnecessaryinautonomouslearning.Teachersplayanimportantroleinhelpingstudentsdevelopefficientlearningstrategies,whilethelearnersshouldplayamoreimportantroleinlearningaforeignlanguage.Theyshouldreadmore,listenmoreand、vritemore.Thelastbutnottheleast,studentsshouldpracticelexicalchunksandoutputthemfrequently.TheresearcheshavelearnedthatlexicalchunksCanhelpgaina57 太原理工大学硕士学位论文betterlanguagelearningstrategy.So,inordertolearnmoreeffectivelyandfastandlayasolidfoundationofEnglish,studentsshouldpracticeandpracticeafterlearningtherelatedknowledgeoflexicalchunks.Becauselearningaforeignlanguageisaimedatoutputting,SOpracticeandoutputareveryimportantandessential.5.2.3ImplicationsforCollegeEnglishEducationAccordingtocollegecurriculumofEnglish,theteachingobjectivesofcollegeEnglishistodevelopstudents’comprehensiveproficiencyinorderthatthestudentsCanlearntocommunicateinEnglishfluently.However,therearesomanychinglishamongsecondlanguagelearners.MostofthemlearnEnglishunderthestructureofEnglishteacherswhoanalyzetextbooksbyteachinggrammarrulesandvocabularymeaning.Asaresult,theyCannotcombinethegrammarrulesandlexicontogetherandoutputfluenttargetlanguage.TheresearcherthinkstherearethreereasonsforthisOneofthereasonsisthatteachersincollegesdonotknowtheknowledgeoflexicalchunksandcannotcombinelexiconandgrammarthemselves.So,theyarenotabletoguidestudentsproperly.Then,thestudentsdonothaveawarenesstocombinegrammarrulesandlexicontogether.Thedeepestreasonisthattherearenoonetoteachthemtodothat.ThisisduetotheEnglisheducationbutnotstudentsthemselvesThelastreasonisthatthecoursedesignofcollegeEnglishisnotthatscientific.TherearelittlechanceforstudentstobeimmersedintremendousauthenticEnglishmaterialinlimitedclasstime.Teachers’taskistOfinishtheanalysingoftextbookbyteachinggrammarandanalysingnewwords.TherearefewteachersCancombinelexiconandgrammarintheirdailyteaching.AttheSalTletime,exercisesonlexicalchunksfirenotsufficientinthetextbooksofcollegestudents.AsSresult,studentsjustmakeupsentencesbyputtingwordstogetheraccordingtogrammarrules,whichmakeslearnersperformnon-natively.So,itisexpectedthateducationofcollegeEnglishCanbedevelopedandimprovedinordertOhelpcombinegrammarand58 太原理工大学硕士学位论文lexicontogether.Therefore,itishig}llyhopedthatawiderangeofteachingmaterialssuitabletoSLlearnerscanbeputintoserviceandlexicalchunkswillplayaimportantroleinthefuturetextbookandpromoteasystematicdevelopmentofitsknowledge.5.3LimitationsofthePresentResearchandSuggestionsforFUrtherResearch5.3.1LimitationsofthePresentResearchEventhoughtheresearcherhasreferredavarietyofmaterialsandtryherbesttodothisresearchandthepresentresearchhaslaidflsmallfoundationforthefuturestudiesonlexicalchunks.therearestillsomelimitationst11atiShardtoovercomeFirstofall,Thisresearchisanexperimentbasedonsamples.Thereareonly60studentsinvolvedintheexperimentinTaiyuanUniversityofTechnology,ShanxiProvince.ThoughthepresentresearchCanmakearelativelypositivecontributiontoresearchesonlexicalchunks,thenumberofsamplesarelimitedinonecollegeinShanxiProvince,letaloneChina.SoitisnecessarythatmuchbiggersamplesshouldbetestedfromdifferentcollegesalloverofChina.Atthesametime,theteachingmaterialisbasedontheNewHorizonEnglish,itmaybenotSOrepresentativeandnotthebesttextbooks,whichisstillwaitingtobeproved.Thesecond,thisresearchonlyinvolvesfreshmeninacollege.Inordertomaketheexperimentcomprehensive,learnersfromalltypesshouldbeinvolvedThen,thetimespanisalsonotlongenough.Becauseitisagraduationthesis,thetimeforanexperimentislimited、^,imcollectingrelatedmaterials,designingtheresearchandanalysingthedata.Eventhoughthemainexperimentlastssixteenweeks,theresearchercouldonlyfindoutthemainhypothesis、Ⅳi廿lthelimitedtime.Ifconditionspermit,alongertimespanmaybringoutmorefruitfulexperimentInaddition,thereisonlyoneessaytaskforthetestandthefinalmarksofeachstudentsarerelativelysubjectively.Moreobjectivemethodshouldbeusedinfurther59 太原理工大学硕士学位论文studies.Thelast,thoughtheresearchhasfoundoutwhatshehaswondered,theyareonlyoneaspectoftheresearchesonlexicalchunks.Thisthesisonlyfocusesontherelationshipbetweentheteachingoflexicalchunksandgrammarability.Therelationshipsbetweenthelexicalchunksandlistening,writingandspeakingarenotmentionedandneedfurtherresearching.5.3.2SuggestionsforFurtherResearchersConsideringthelimitationsofthisresearch,theresearchermaygivesuggestionsforf-岫erresearches.1)Expandthesamplescalesandenrichthesourceofsamples.Moresamplesandrichsubjectsearlprovideamorerepresentativeresults.Underthesanlecondition,themoresamplestheexperimentcontains,thepersuasivetheresultis.Inordertomaketheresearchmorerepresentative,therelatedlaterresearcherscanenlargethesamples.Atthesametime,samplesfromdifferentlevelsarebetter.ThelaterresearchCaninvolvesamplesfromdifferentlevelindifferentschoolsandevenindifferentprovinces.2)Enrichtheexperimentaltools.Theexperimentaltoolsinthisresearchislimited.Morekindsoftoolsshouldbeappliedinthef-蛐erstudy,suchasmachinestotestthepsychologicalchangesofthestudentsandobservationoftheirdetailedchangesduringtheexperiment.Asiswidelyknown,experimenttoolsofEnglishresearcharenotveryadvancesandveryscarce.AsanEnglishresearcher,weshouldactivelyleamtheadvancedresearchingmethodsandtoolsfromforeigncountriesSOthattheresearchinChinacanmakeasignificantprogress.3)Increasethetimeofresearching.Longtimeobservationandtrainingmaybemoreeffectiveandrepresentative.LongtimespanCanensureadetailedobservationofthesamplesandmaketheexperimentmorecredible.4)Investigatetheinfluenceoflexicalchunkstheoryinvariousaspects.OnlythecomprehensiveresearchCanhelpapplythetheoryintherealteachingeffectiveand 太原理工大学硕士学位论文appropriate.Lexicaltheoryismoreandmorepopularduringtheseyears.Itisverypotentialforlanguageteachingandhasnotbeenresearchedandusedwidely 太原理工大学硕士学位论文 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ChapterSixConclusionGrammarteachinghasbeenanindispensableandessentialpartofforeignlanguageteaching.Traditionalgrammarteachingisakindofteachingandpracticingofgrammaticalrules,whosedisadvantageshavebeendiscussedformanyyearsPeoplehavebeenarguingthatgrammaticalstructuresCannotbetransformedintounconsciouslanguageabilityHowever,witllthetheoryoflanguagechunksbeingpopular,researchersfoundthatgrammarisnolongerafixedstructurebutaunityofstructuresandmeaning,whichismutativeanddiscoursal.Thatistosay,foreignlanguageteachersshouldseeandteachlanguageinanewperspective.ThisthesisaimsatinvestigatingifthereareanypositiveeffectiveoflexicaltheoryongrammarabilityandisbasedonthetheoryofLexicalApproachbyMichaelLewis(1997).Theexperimentisdividedintothreestageswithbothquantitativeanalysisandqualitativeanalysis.Afteranalysingthedatacollectedintheexperiment,theresearcherfindsoutthatlexicalchunkstheoryhasapositiveeffectonthegrammarteachingandlearning,whichCaneasilyproveLewis。lexicalapproachtheory(1993).ThisisquiteusefulinthefieldofSLAandSLteaching.ItCanwellguidelanguageteacherstoteachEnglishinanewwayandguideresearcherstohaveathinkingongrammarteachingTheresultofthesethesistosomeextentcoincideswiththeformerresearchonlexicalchunksinChina.Justaswhathavebeendiscussedintheformerchapter,YanWeihua(2004)madeaconclusionthattheknowledgeoflexicalchunksCanhelpimproveleamers’abilityofusingthetargetlanguageproperly.YaoYubao(2003)foundthataftertrainedwitlllexicalchunks.1earners’levelofspokenEnglishmadegreatprogress.PuJianzhong(2003)alsoholdthatvocabularyteachingshouldstrengthenlexicalchunksteaching.Atthesametime,thisthesisemphasizesontherelationshipbetweenthelexicalchunksandgrammarteaching,whichismuchnewer63 太原理工大学硕士学位论文andmorecreativeinthisresearchfield.Consideringthelimitationsandsuggestionsofthisresearch,itCanalsolaysomefoundationforfurtherstudiesonlexicalchunksandmakesomecontributionsforfurtherresearcherstoavoidmakingthesamemistakes 太原理工大学硕士学位论文BIBLIOGRAPHY[1]Becker,J.ThePhrasalLexicon[M].CambridgeMass:BoltandNewman,1975.[2]BiberD,JohanssonS,LeechG,ConradS&FineganE.LongmanGrammarofSpokenandWrittenEnglish[z].London:Longman,1999.[3]Bolinger,D.1976.MeaningandMemory[J】.ForumLinguisticum(1):114[4]Conzett,J.IntegratingCollocaiotnintoaReadingandWritingCourse.InLewisMichael(Ed.),Teachingcollocation.Furtherdevelopmentsinthelexicalapproach.【M].Hove,England:LanguageTeachingPublication,2000.70—87[5]Cortes,V,Jones,J.,&StoHebF.LexicalbundlesinESPreadingandwriting.PaperpresentedattheTESOLConference,SaltLakeCity,UT,2002[6]Ellis,N.C.SequencinginSLA:phonologicalmemory,chunkingandpointsoforder【J].StudiesinSecondLanguageAcquisition18(1996):91-126.[71Ellis,R.1994.TheStudyofSecondLanguageAcquisitionif[M】.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.[8]Firth,J.R.ModesofMeaning.EssaysandStudies(TheEnglishAssociation),1951.118-149.【9]Hoey,M.Patternsoflexisintext.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.1991.【10]Krashen,S.D.SecondLangageAcqisitionandSecondLangageLearning[M].Oxford:PergamanPress,1981.[11]lewisM.TheLexicalApproch[M].Hove,England:LanguageTeachingPublication,1993【12]lewisM.ImplementingtheLexicalApproach:PuttingtheoryintoPractice.[M]Hove,England:LanguageTeachingPublication,1997[13]NattingerJR&DeCarricoJS.LexicalPhrasesandLanguageTeaching.65 太原理工大学硕士学位论文[M】.Oxford.OxfordUniversityPress,1992【14]Sinclair,J.Corpus,Concordance,Collocation[M].OxfordUniversityPress,1991.【15]Wray,A.FomulaicLanguage:PushingtheBound-aries【M】.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,2008.【16]Wray,A.FormulaicLanguageandtheLexicon[M].Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2002:9.【17]常晨光.公式性语言的功能[J】.外语与外语教学,2004,(2):7一10.【18】陈伟平.增强学生词块意识,提高学生写作能力外语界,【J].2008.(3):48—53.【19]戴曼纯.语块学习、构式学习与补丁式外语教学【J]-夕}语界.2012(1):52.60.【20]戴炜栋.二语语法教学理论综述【J].外语教学与研究.2005,(3):92.99.121]硼.英语本科生词块能力调查【J】I解放军外国语学院学报,2004,(4):35.38.122]桂诗春.我国外语教学的新思考【J】.外国语,2004(4):2-9.【23]黄慧,建构主义视角下的大学英语语法教学研究【D】;上海外国语大学;2007年【24]黄燕.王海啸.二语语块研究的中国“图景”:语块研究的现状和前瞻[J]外语界,2011,(3):74.81.f25】蒋宇红.词块教学促进英语学习者口语交际的实证研究[J].国际关系学院学报,2008,(3):86—90.【26】刘加英.词块与大学英语口语教学[J].山东外语教学,2006,(4):88—90.【27】毛澄怡.语块及其在英语学习者会话中的使用特征[J].解放军#bin语学院学报,2008,(2):58~62.[281-5广惠.词块的界定、分类与识别【J].解放军外国语学院学报,2011,(1):1一.[29】马广惠.英语专业学生二语限时写作中的词块研究[J】.外语教学与研究,2009,(1):54—_60.[30】戚焱.英语专业学生口语中词块使用情况的跟踪研究[J】.外语界,2010,(5):34.41.[31】苏丹洁.语块是构式和词项的中介-以现代汉语“V起NP来”为例【J】.中山大学学报2012,(1):69.76.【32】濮建忠.英语词汇教学中的类连接、搭配及词块.【J】外语教学与研究.2003(11):438-445.【33]濮建忠,卫乃兴.词汇和语法【J】;解放军外国语学院学报;2000年02期^6 太原理工大学硕士学位论文【34】王春艳.免费绿色软件AntConc在外语教学和研究中的应用【J].外语电化教学,2009(1):45.48.[35】王立非,梁茂成.WordSmith方法在外语教学研究中的应用[J].外语电化教学,2007(3、:3-7.【361:E鲥b,张大凤.国外二语预制语块习得研究的方法进展与启示【J].外语与外语教学,2006(5、:17-21.【37】卫乃兴.专业性搭配初探语料库语言学方法[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2001,(4):19.23.【38132乃兴.词语搭配的界定与研究体系D阅.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2002.薛国凤:当代西方建构主义教学理论研究[D]:河北大学:2003年[39]严维华.语块对基本词汇习得的作用[J】.解放军外国语学院学报,2003,(6):58—62.[40]杨玉晨,杨玉英.从词汇触发透视中国学生二语词汇认知图式的构建⋯.以moreandmore为例【J].夕}语教学理论与实践.2010(2):36—43.[4l】于秀莲.语块教学法与提高英语应用能力的实验研究【J]-夕}语界,2008(3).[42]詹宏伟.语料库中语块提取的工具与方法[J].外语教学.201l,(3):23.26.[43]张凌岩,陈莹.词块训练对大学生英语口语表达能力影响的实验研究【J].山东外语教学.2011,(2):67.67.[44]张淑静.从反应类型看词汇习得.【J】外语教学与研究.2003(7):275-280.[45]周健.语块在对外汉语教学中的价值与作用.2007(1):99.103.【46】周红红.文化特色词与双语词典[A】.中国辞书学会双语词典专业委员会第6届年会暨学术研讨会论文专辑[C】.2005年67 太原理工大学硕士学位论文 太原理工大学硕士学位论文ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAftermanytimesofmodificationandpolishing,thispaperisfinallycompleted1wouldliketothankallthepeoplewhohaveofferedmegreatsupportandhelpFirstandforemost,1woddliketothankmyrespectedsupervisorProfessorHaoMei,withoutwhoseenlightenmentandguidance,thisdissertationwasimpossibletobefinished.Ifeelluckytohavewitnessherwisdomandrigorousresearchattitude,whichencouragesmesomuchthatIhavethemotivationtodotheresearchearnestlyandrigorouslyThen,1wouldliketothankmybestfriendsandpeersheartfeltly.Theyhelpedmecollectrelatedmaterialsfromdifferentlibraries.Meanwhile,withouttheirhelpwithmylearningSPSS,1wouldneverfinishthisexperimentLastbutnottheleast,1wouldliketoexpressmybestgratitudetomydearparents,whohavegivenmegreatspiritualsupportandendlesslove 太原理工大学硕士学位论文 太原理工大学硕士学位论文PUBLISHEDPAPERS姚佳宁,语法教学新思路:语块教学,《中国科教创新导刊》,2013,3:102.103姚佳宁,语块理论综述,《山西大学学报(社会科学版)》增刊,2013,5 太原理工大学硕士学位论文