• 128.50 KB
  • 2022-06-17 15:55:35 发布

毕业设计(论文)--任务型教学法在高中英语语法中的应用研究

  • 24页
  • 当前文档由用户上传发布,收益归属用户
  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、本文档内容版权归属内容提供方,所产生的收益全部归内容提供方所有。如果您对本文有版权争议,可选择认领,认领后既往收益都归您。
  3. 3、本文档由用户上传,本站不保证质量和数量令人满意,可能有诸多瑕疵,付费之前,请仔细先通过免费阅读内容等途径辨别内容交易风险。如存在严重挂羊头卖狗肉之情形,可联系本站下载客服投诉处理。
  4. 文档侵权举报电话:19940600175。
学院毕业设计(论文)题目任务型教学法在高中英语语法中的应用研究系(院)外语系专业英语班级2008级1班学生姓名学号指导教师职称二〇一二年六月二十日 ApplicationofTask-basedLanguageTeachingtoEnglishGrammarTeachinginSeniorHighSchoolAThesisSubmittedinpartialfulfillmentoftheRequirementsfortheDegreeofBachelorofArtsbyoSupervisor:AssociateProf.UniversityJune2012 独创声明本人郑重声明:所呈交的毕业设计(论文),是本人在指导老师的指导下,独立进行研究工作所取得的成果,成果不存在知识产权争议。尽我所知,除文中已经注明引用的内容外,本设计(论文)不含任何其他个人或集体已经发表或撰写过的作品成果。对本文的研究做出重要贡献的个人和集体均已在文中以明确方式标明。本声明的法律后果由本人承担。 作者签名:二〇一二年六月二十日 毕业设计(论文)使用授权声明本人完全了解滨州学院关于收集、保存、使用毕业设计(论文)的规定。本人愿意按照学校要求提交学位论文的印刷本和电子版,同意学校保存学位论文的印刷本和电子版,或采用影印、数字化或其它复制手段保存设计(论文);同意学校在不以营利为目的的前提下,建立目录检索与阅览服务系统,公布设计(论文)的部分或全部内容,允许他人依法合理使用。(保密论文在解密后遵守此规定) 作者签名:二〇一二年六月二十日 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)任务型教学法在高中英语语法教学中的应用研究摘要任务型教学以语言学等理论为基础,强调在交际活动中使用和掌握语言,让学生通过感知、体验、实践、参与、合作与交流的交际课堂活动实现任务的目标。任务型教学法妥善的克服了传统语法教学的不足,被认为是提高学生的语言能力的一种行之有效的方法。然而在我国中学英语课堂的语法教学中应用这种教学模式的实证研究却并不多见。本文通过教学实践来探究语法教学中应用任务型教学模式的可行性和有效性,采用了实验法和文献综述法。大量的理论支持和实验班与对照班考试成绩的对比分析表明用任务型教学模式教授语法在学生的知识掌握上比传统的语法教学法有更好的效果,而且,这也有助于促进学生学习语法的态度和动机。关键词:任务型教学模式;传统教学法;语法教学II 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)ApplicationofTask-basedLanguageTeachinginEnglishGrammarTeachingofHighSchoolAbstractTask-basedlanguageteachingisbasedonlinguistics.Itemphasizesonusingandmasteringlanguageincommunicativeactivities.Itmakesstudentstorealizethegoalsintheclassactivityoftheperception,experience,practice,participation,cooperationandexchanges.Task-basedteachingovercomestheshortcomingsoftraditionalgrammarteachingandisregardedasaneffectivemethodinpromotinglearners’languagecompetence.However,empiricalstudiesofitsapplicationarerarelyfoundinthefieldofgrammarteachinginChina,especiallyintheseniorhighschool.Inthisthesis,aresearchisconductedtoprobeintothevalidityandfeasibilityofTBAingrammarteachinginseniorhighschool.Itmakesananalysisofwhatisdrawnfromtheexperimentalteaching.TheresultsshowthatTBAisanefficientandadvancedapproach.ItprovesthatgrammarteachinginTBAcanhaveabettereffectthantraditionalapproachandatthesametimeitcanfacilitatethestudents"attitudesandmotivationsingrammarlearning.Keywords:Task-basedapproach;thetraditionalteachingmethod;theseniorhighschoolEnglishgrammarteachingII 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)ContentsIntroduction2ChapterOneLiteratureReview31.1GrammarandGrammarteaching41.1.1Definitionsofgrammarandgrammarteaching41.1.2Relevantresearchaboard51.1.3RelevantresearchesinChina61.2Taskandtask-basedteaching61.2.1Definitionsoftask61.2.2Therelevantresearches7ChapterTwoTheExperimentalImplementationofTBA82.1Purposesoftheexperiment82.2Subjectsoftheexperiment92.3Instrumentsoftheexperiment92.4Materialsoftheexperiment102.5Proceduresoftheexperiment102.5.1Preparation102.5.2Implementation102.6Resultsoftheexperiment12ChapterThreeFindingsandAnalysis133.1Severalproblemsintheimplementation133.2Suggestions13ChapterFourReflectionandExpectation154.1Limitationsoftheresearch154.2Suggestionsforfurtherresearch15Conclusion15Bibliography17Acknowledgments1919 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)IntroductionAnewroundofcurriculumreformisbeingcarriedoutthroughoutthecountry,withnewteachingideasinfluencingteachers"ideasandbehavior.Thereforetheatmosphereinclassisimproved.However,itisfoundthatthebasisofthemajorityofthestudentsongrammarisstillweak,especiallythecountymiddleschoolstudents.TheystillfeelverydifficultintheprocessofEnglishlearning.Forexample:whentheyarewriting,theycanonlywritesomesimpleEnglishsentences,andcouldn"twritesomeothernormative,meaningfulstatements.Asfarasthesentencestructure,theyareconfused,andcannotwritebeautifulpassagesorarticles.Now,variousEnglishpubliclessonsarealsoverypopular,butmostofallarelisteningandspeaking,andtherearefewteacherstotakegrammarasthemaincontentoftheshow.InChina,schoolsusuallyadoptthemethodsofdeclarativegrammarrules,withmoststudentstakingnotesanddoingexercises.Thetraditionalteachingmethoddoeshavesomeadvantages,buttothestudents,itisboring.Itisnoteasytoarousestudents"learningenthusiasm.Underthetraditionalteachingmode,studentscouldnotmasterknowledgeasmuchaspossible,soitisnecessarytofindwhichmodeofthegrammarteachingisthemosteffective.Thenewcurriculumstandarddescribesindetailtheaimsofthevariouslevelsofthegrammarintheseniorhighschools,andadvocatesschoolstousethetask-basedteachingmethodinEnglishinstruction.Thisshowsthatthetask-basedteachingapproachonEnglishgrammarteachingisanewway,whichisalsothekeyoffocus.Aboutgrammarteachingandtask-basedteaching,domesticandforeignscholarshavedonetherelevantresearch,butmostconcentratedonthecitymiddleschool,rarelyinvolvingschoolsinthecountryside.Sothispaperchoosesstudentsfromthecountryschoolsasthesubjects.Andtheresearchbasedonthenewcurriculum,hopestoconfirmthatwhethertask-basedteachingisbeneficialtoimprovestudents"grammaticalcompetencecomparedwiththetraditional3Pmodel.Next,thisarticlefromtheperspectiveofemotionalattitude,designedaquestionnaire,hopingtoprovethatwhetherthetask-basedteachingmethodismorebeneficialtoimprovestudents"learninggrammar19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)interest,andarousetheenthusiasmofthestudents.Atthesametime,theauthoralsowantstoprovidesomereferenceforthefutureEnglishteaching.Thestructureofthepaperisasfollows:Thefirstchapterintroducestheresearchpurposeandsignificance,summarizestheresearchcontents,andputsforwardtheframework.Thesecondchapterexplainsthedefinitionofgrammarteachingandtask-basedteaching,andanoverviewofitsresearchstatusathomeandabroad.ThethirdchaptershowstheimportanceoftasksseparatelyfromthreeaspectsofthehighschoolEnglish,andthecurrentstatusofthegrammar.Thefourthchapterisabouttheapplicationoftask-basedteachingapproachinseniorhighschoolEnglishgrammarteaching,includingresearchhypothesis,object,procedureandtheteachingmode.Thefifthchapterpresentstheanalysisoftheexperimentalresultsandquestionnairedata,theresults,andanalysisofitscauses.Thesixthchaptermakesconclusions,andputsforwardsomecorrespondingsuggestions.ChapterOneLiteratureReviewThisarticlemainlystudiesgrammarteachingandtask-basedteaching.Foreignexpertsandscholarshavegivenenoughattentiontothesetworespects,andmadesomeresearches.Fromthisperspective,task-basedteachingandgrammarteachingresearchmainlyfocusedontheUniversity,highschoolsorpartofcitycenter,rarelyinvolvingthecountymiddleschool.Itmainlyinvolvestheapplicationinreading,listening,andwriting.Howevertherearefewstudiesinthegrammarteachingbasedonthetask-basedteachingmethod.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)1.1GrammarandGrammarteaching1.1.1DefinitionsofgrammarandgrammarteachingGrammarhasbeendefinedindifferentwaysbydifferentlinguists.Lyons(1971)definesgrammaras“thatbranchofdescriptionoflanguageswhichaccountsforthewaywhichwordscombineintosentences(quotesfromStern,1983:131),Brown(1994)thinksgrammaras“asystemofrulesgoverningtheconventionalarrangementandrelationshipofwordsinasentence“,andBastogne(1994a)thinkthat“grammarisnotsimplyformalnetwork,butacommunicativedevicewhichisfunctionalmotivated”.LongmanDictionaryofContemporaryEnglish(Longman,1995)saysthatgrammaris(thestudyandthepracticeof)therulesbywhichwordschangetheirformsandarecombinedintosentence.Inthepresentresearch,Englishgrammarmeansthesentence-levelEnglishgrammaritemspresentedinthesenioronemiddleschoolstudents’Englishtextbooks."OxfordAdvancedLearner"sDictionary"explains:"Grammar-rulersforformingwordsandcombiningthemintosentences”ShuDingfang,ZhuangZhixiang(1996)arguesthatgrammaristhegeneraldescriptionoflanguage,mainlyonitstheoreticaldescriptionincludingphonology(phonemicandcombinationrules),syntax(wordandphrasecombinationrule),lexicologyandsemantics(themeaningofwordsandtheircombinationrules).Inshort,thegrammaristhelanguagedescriptiononwordsintosentencespattern.Thenwhatisthemeaningof"grammarteaching"?LiGuanyi(1990)arguesthattheso-calledgrammarteachingabsolutelydoesnotmeantoteachmanygrammarrules.Itisimportantthatthestudentshaveacompleteclearconceptonthegrammarsystem.Moreimportantly,studentsmustbeabletomastertherulesofgrammaranditsapplicationinpractice,whichcanbeeasytoreadandunderstandtheneedsofprofessionalinformation,andtoexpressrelatedinformationinspoken,writtenexpressiontodifferentdegrees.HuangYuanZhen(2003)arguesthatgrammarteachingisbasedinteachinggrammar.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)Itisteachingactivitiestotrainstudentstoacquiretheinternalstructureof.Itisthebasisofstudents’languagepracticesuchaslistening,saying,reading,andwriting.GrammarisessentialcontentinlearningEnglish.1.1.2RelevantresearchaboardManyschoolsofpedagogyhaveappearedinthehistoryofforeignlanguageteaching.Theyhavetheirowndifferentviewsonthestatusandroleofgrammarteaching.Thegrammartranslationmethodthinksthatthegrammaristhemaincontentofforeignlanguagelearning.Therefore,itputsthegrammarteachingasthecentraltask.Moreover,masteringgrammarrulesisalsothedirectgoalintheteachingactivitiesinclass.TheGrammar-translationmethodasanearlyEnglishgrammarteachingmethoddominatedovertheEnglishteachingforseveralhundredyearsinthewesterncountriesinwhichEnglishgrammaristhecoreoftheEnglishteaching.Itwastaughtdeductively.Untilearlythetwentiethcentury,theGrammar-translationmethodwasreplacedbytheAudio-lingualmethod.TheAudio-lingualmethodadvocatedthatlisteningandspeakingisthemaincontent,butitdoesnotopposetogrammarteaching.Thedirectmethoddoesnotarguetoteachgrammardirectly,andencouragesstudentstomasterthelanguagematerialinadvance,andthensummarizesthegrammarrulesfromtheaccumulatedperceptualmaterials,namelythroughtheinductiveapproachtoacquiregrammar.ThenaturallawoftheKrashenandTerrellbelievesthatlanguageofthelawisanaturalacquisition,andtheroleisnotobviousforthegrammarlearning.Atpresent,foreignlanguageteachingisgenerallyconcernedabouttheriseofgrammaticalconsciousness,referredtoasCR.RutherfordandSherwoodSmithclearlydefinedCR:consciouslytoattractlearners"attentiontothetargetlanguageform.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)1.1.3RelevantresearchesinChinaAstogrammarteaching,quiteafewscholarshavenotonlyrevealedthepurposeofteachinggrammar,butalsoraisedsomeoftheirownviews,andmanymaterialsandreferencesareprovidedforthefuture.HuZhuanglin(2000)pointedoutthatthepurposeoflanguageeducationincludesthatteachingstudentsthecorrectmeaningfulandappropriateuseofEnglish.Thesyntaxshouldbeseenasarationaldynamicsystemratherthanstaticsystemofarbitraryrules.ShaoYouxue(2007)questionedtheconvergenceofthecollegeenrollmentcollegeEnglishteachingandsecondaryschoolEnglishteachingandthoughtthatEnglishgrammarteachinginthesecondaryschoolhadnotbeengivenenoughattention.LiShuangyan,MaJiangtao(2009)proposedseveralgrammarteaching,withtheaimofestablishingarelaxedandhappylearningatmospheretohelpstudentsbuildthegrammarsystem.Theexperimentalresultsshowthatthismethodfostersstudents"confidence.1.2Taskandtask-basedteaching1.2.1DefinitionsoftaskTask-basedlanguagelearningwasdefinedbyBreen(1987)as“anystructuredlanguagelearningendeavorwhichhasaparticularobjective,appropriatecontent,aspecifiedworkingprocedure,andarangeofoutcomesforthosewhoundertakethetask“.Skehan(2001:95)proposesthattasksareclassroomactivitiesinwhich:-meaningisprimary;-thereissomecommunicativeproblemtosolve;-thereissomesortofrelationshiptocomparablereal-worldactivities;-taskcompletionhassomepriority;-theassessmentoftaskisintermsofoutcome.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)1.2.2TherelevantresearchesWills(1996)proposedframeworkfortheimplementationofatask-basedteachingprocess.Inherview,theframeworkcreatesasubstantialenvironmentforlanguagelearninginordertoimprovethelearners"languageperception,andfluencyandaccuracyoflanguage.Theprocedureisdividedintothreestages:pre-task,task,languagefocus.Ataskusuallyinvolveslistening,speaking,reading,andwriting.Learnersbeginwithafullexperienceoflanguageuse,andlookattheendofthenaturalfeaturesofthelanguage.Ellis(2003)thoughtthattask-basedlanguageteachingisbasedonthe"constructivist"teachingmethod,andrefersthatcommunicationneedtoidentifythelanguagelearningtaskaccordingtoreallife.Studentsaroundthistaskmakeplansandachievetheplanthroughtheirownefforts,completethetask,andassesstheirownlearningintheprocesscontinuously.Skehan(1998),proposedfivecharacteristicsofthetask:thesignificanceofthetaskactivitiesistheprimary;topayattentiontostudents"communicationofinformation,ratherthanonwhatlanguageform;taskrelatewithsimilaractivitiesintherealworld;acommunicationproblemtobesolved;tocompletethetaskistheprimaryconsideration.DavidNunan,(2004)explainthevariousaspectsofthetask-basedteachingfromthedefinitionofthetask-basedteaching、framework、thestructure、theevaluationoftask-basedteachingandthedevelopmentoftasksandteacher.Task-basedteachingasanexoticinChinahasbeenwidelydisseminatedandapplied,especiallyinEnglishteaching.EnglishgrammarteachingisanimportantpartoftheEnglishteaching.Task-basedteachinghasalsoplayedanimportantroleintheEnglishgrammarteaching.ManyscholarsinChinahavemadethestudyontheapplicationoftask-basedteachinginEnglishgrammarteaching.ChengXuexia(2005)researchindicatesthat,inthecurrentcollegeentranceexamination,thetraditionalteachingandtask-basedteachingapproachinimprovingthelevelofEnglishgrammaronthesignificantdifferencewasnotobvious,butthetask-basedteachinggreatlyimprovesstudents"learninginterestinEnglishgrammar,19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)self-confidence,learningstrategyandlearningmotivation.Throughherresearchin"task-basedlearning"theoreticalbasisintheuseofgrammarandtherelevantcontentof"task",sheliststheproposedtask-basedteachingmodebyWillsandSkehan,andsummedupthemainprincipleof"task"underthetask-basedteachingmodedesign.GanYang(2006)exploredthefeasibilityandeffectivenessoftheapplicationoftask-basedteachinggrammarteachingwiththeexperimentsofsubjunctivemoodinEnglishgrammarteaching.Onthebasisofthepastgrammarresearches,heputforwardtheobviousadvantagesoftask-basedlanguageteaching,andstatedthefoundationofpsychologicallinguisticsandeducationalfoundation.HealsocitedthetasksproposedbyWills.Thetaskiscomposedofthreestages:pre-task,task,languagefocus.Hethinksthetask-basedteachingforforeignlanguageteachinginChinahasthreemajorpoints:(1)thestudentscannotonlyobtainthegrammarknowledge,butalsothesignificanceexchange;(2)InTask-basedLanguageTeaching"grammar"asthecontentofthe"task",thecommunicativeapproachismoremeaningful.Studentsaremoreinterested,havemorepower;(3)thegrammaristhecentertask,sothatstudentscanusethetargetlanguagetosolveproblemsandcompletethetask.YangAiling(2007)proposedoneeffectivetasktypeteachingmodetoimprovestudents"languageability,onthebasisofanalysisoftraditionalgrammarteachingtogiveprioritytoteachingmode(3Pmethod).Inherpaper,shemadeanelaborationoftaskandtask-basedteaching,andmadeanoverviewofhowtoteachEnglishgrammar.ChapterTwoTheExperimentalImplementationofTBA2.1PurposesoftheexperimentThischapteraimstocontrasttask-basedgrammarteachingwithtraditionalteachingofgrammarthroughanexperiment,andwantstoprovewhethertask-basedgrammarteachingisadaptabletoseniorhighschoolstudents.What’smore,ithopestoexaminetheeffectsofthisteachingmethodonEnglishlearning.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)Thetwoquestionsarestudiedandinvestigated:whetherthetask-basedgrammarteachingmethodcanreceivetheeffect;whetherthetask-basedteachingmodeofgrammarlearningissuperiortothetraditionalmodeofgrammarlearning.2.2SubjectsoftheexperimentSubjectswereselectedfromthefirstgradestudentsofaseniorhighschool.Theauthorchoosestwoclasseswiththeparallelconditions.Thebasismainlyhas:first,thesetwoclassesareinstructedbythesameteachers.Second,twoclassesofalmostallstudentsarefromthesamearea,andhavesimilarculturalbackground,whichcanstandforthewholeconditions.Third,parallelclassstudents"grammaticallevelmayrepresentthesamegradestudentsatthesyntaxlevel.Fourth,thegradesinthelasttermprovethatthetwoclasseshadnosignificantdifferenceinEnglishlevel.Thereforethetwoparallelclassesinthisexperimentwererandomlydividedintotheexperimentalgroup(60)andcontrolgroup(61people).2.3InstrumentsoftheexperimentInthisstudy,theattributiveclausegrammarteachingisdesignedasanindependentvariable,withstudents’differentlevelsofmasteringtheattributiveclauseasthedependentvariable.Thestudywasdividedintothreephases:thefirstispre-test,lettwogroupsofstudentsexaminethecertainknowledgeoftheattributiveclausewithoutanyanalysis,andtestdataisnotreturnedtostudents,whichaimstoensurethatthedifficultyofpre-testandposttestarethesameinordertocomparetheresultsoftwoteachingmethodofexperimental.Thenexttwoweeksistheexperimentalstage.Theattributiveclauseisregardedasanexampletostudy.Subjectshaveagrammarlessonperweekexceptthenormalscheduleoflearning.Thelessonisinstructedbythesameteacherswithadoptingdifferentteachingmethod,i.e.experimentgroupbyusingtask-basedgrammarteaching,andthecontrolledclassadoptinggrammartranslationmethod.Thelastphaseisthattheexperimentalgroupandthecontrolgroupagainaretestedaftertwoweeks.The19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)pretestandposttestusethesamepapers.Thedataofpretestandposttestisanalyzedusingthestatisticalsoftware.2.4MaterialsoftheexperimentThematerialsareallextractedfromthefollowingbooks:acompulsoryteachingbookofhighschoolEnglish;"Englishgrammar"(BaoBing2002);"SparkEnglishcollegeentranceexaminationofEnglishgrammar"(MaDegao1999);"universalgrammar"(zhangzhenbang1999).ThesematerialsareauthorityinEnglishgrammarwithcredibility,whichcanguaranteethereliabilityandvalidityofexperimentalmaterials.2.5Proceduresoftheexperiment2.5.1PreparationFirstpre-testandpost-testmaterialsaredesigned.Thetestconsistsof40questions.Thefirstpartinvolves10trueorfalsequestionsabouttheattributiveclauseinordertoarousestudents"consciousnessabouttheattributiveclause,andthenthe20questionismultiple-choicequestion,whichisfromthecollegeentranceexamination.Studentswilljudgeandchoosetheanswersinordertotestwhetherstudentscantrulymastertheusageandfunctionofattributiveclause.2.5.2Implementation(1)Pre-testThefirstispre-test,lettwogroupsofstudentsoftheexperimentalclassandthecontrolledclasstestrelatedknowledgeoftheattributiveclausewithoutanyanalysis,andtestdataisnotreturnedtostudents,whichistoensurethatthedifficultyofpretestandposttestarethesameinordertocomparetheresultsoftwoteachingmethodofexperiment.Differencesoftheexperimentalgroupandthecontrolledgroupstudentsshouldbetested.Throughtheconsciousselection,thedifferencesfromallaspectsarenotclearas19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)faraspossibletoensurethatthestudentsintheexperimentalgroupandthecontrolledgroupstudents.(2)ProcessingThesameteachersareselectedaccordingtotheexperimentalintention,withexperimentalgroupbyusingtask-basedgrammarteaching,andthecontrolledclassadoptinggrammartranslationmethod.Theteachingtime,content,progressandotheraspectsremainfairlysimilar.Thus,theexperimentalclassandcontrolledclasskeeponbalanceinalotoffactors,sotheexperimentalclassandcontrolledclasseffectsalsocanmaintainthebalance,whichcanensuretheeffectsoftwokindsofexperimentalteaching.(3)Post-testThetwogroupsaretestedonattributiveclausegrammar.Thedataincludestheanalysisoftheresultsofthepre-testandthepost-test.StatisticaltoolsareSPSSll.0,andthedatathroughtheTvalueshowtherelationshipsbetweenvariables.Theexperimentalresultscanberequiredbystatisticaltoolsforstudents.Becauseofthetwogroupsofnumbersaremorethan60soweuseTtesttocalculatethevalueofTintwogroupsinordertoshowsignificantdifferencesbetweenthem,andcompareresultswithpre-testtoseethatifresultsinthepost-testisimproved.Thespecificresultsasshowninthefollowingtable:Table1pre-testGroupnumbersaverageStandarddeviationExperimentalgroup60646.75Controlledgroup61657.72Table2post-testT=0.084GroupnumbersaverageStandarddeviationExperimentalgroup617211.24Controlledgroup60797.3219 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)Table3ControlledgroupT=4.2GroupnumbersaverageStandarddeviationPre-test61646.75Post-test617211.24T=3.45Table4ExperimentalgroupGroupnumbersaverageStandarddeviationPre-test60657.72Post-test60797.32T=9.452.6ResultsoftheexperimentTable1experimentalresultsshow:twogroupsbeforetheexperimenthavenosignificancedifferenceongrammarlevel.Thisshowsthatthenexttwoteachingisnotaffectedbyanypreviousgrammarlevel.Throughtwoweeksofsystemicgrammarteaching,fromtheaverageofpost-testresults(Table2),theexperimentalgroupandthecontrolgrouprisecertainly,respectively79and72.Theresultsshows:twogroupsatthesyntaxlevelaftertheexperimenthassignificantdifferences,whichprovestask-basedgrammarlearningismoreeffectivethanthetraditionalmodeofteaching.Butthestandarddeviationoftwogroupsimprovedwithunbalancedlevel.Thisshowslargelythattraditionalteachingmethodissuitableforthesmallnumberofstudents,andthetask-basedteachingmethodismoreconducivetoimprovingtheoveralllevel.Inaddition,tothecontrolgroupaftertwoweeksoflearning,somestudentshavemadegreatprogress,whileotherstudentsdrop.What’smore,thegroupbeforeandafterthetwotestofthestandarddeviationis6.75and11.24(Table3)withfluctuationabout66.62percentagepoints,whichagainshowsthatthetraditionalteachingmethodcanimprovethesmallpartofthestudentsratherthanmoststudents.Thedataanalysisprovesthatthetask-basedteachingmethodismoresuitableforhighschoolEnglishgrammarteaching,becausetheteachingisforallstudents,notjustonepart.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)ChapterThreeFindingsandAnalysis3.1SeveralproblemsintheimplementationTask-basedgrammarteachingisakindofeffectiveteachingmethodtoimprovestudents"languagecompetence.However,theimplementationoftask-basedgrammarteachingisnoteasyinthecurrenteducationsystemasaneducationalgoal-orientedexamination.Task-basedgrammarteachingofhighschoolalsoputforwardhigherrequirementsforEnglishteacher.Firstofall,fromthetraditional3Pgrammarteachingmodetotask-basedgrammarteachingmode,itisnotaneasytaskfortheteachers.Teachersandstudentswhoarefamiliarwith3Pmodecannotinashorttimechangehabitsofthetraditionalgrammarteaching.Learnerswillfindthatitisveryhardtomaintainabalancebetweenaccuracyandfluency.Theybelievethattask-basedgrammarteachingisawasteoftimeandworsethantraditional3Pmodeoperation.Secondly,thetask-basedteachingmethodhasnocorrespondingteachingoutlineandteachingmaterialasakindofteachingthought.Althoughthenewcurriculumstandardadvocatestask-basedteachingmethod,thereisnoappropriatetextbookpublishedtokeepbalancebetweengrammarcompetenceandcommunicativecompetence.Itisrelativelydifficulttodesignsuchgrammarteachingmaterials,thereforeteachersneedtoreorganizetheteachingmaterialanddesignvariousgrammaticaltasksaccordingtothestudent"slevel.Thirdly,howtomaketeacherstomasterbalanceofthedevelopmentofstudents"communicativecompetenceandtheexamination-orientededucationsystemisahotissueintheforeignlanguageteaching.3.2SuggestionsTask-basedgrammarteachingemphasizesonthelong-termdevelopmentofthestudents"communicativeability.Intheinitialstudyphaselearnersmayfinditdifficultto19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)maintain,especiallywhennotimmediatelyseethewantedresultsintheexamination.Therefore,thispaperputsforwardthefollowingsuggestionsforEnglishteachers:(1)Teachersshouldunderstandandbecomefamiliarwithstudentsinadvance.Whenteachersdesigntasks,theymustfirstknowthestudentslevelinordertodeterminethedifficultyofthetask.Moreover,takingintoaccounttherelativelylargenumberofChinesehighschoolclassroomstudents,teachersshouldnotethestudents"individualdifferences,andwhenorganizegroupactivities,takingintoaccountindividualcircumstancestoensurethesuccessfulcompletionofactivitiesandtasks.(2)Thedesignoftaskshouldhavegrade:fromeasytodifficult,fromsimpletocomplex.Fullconsiderationshouldbegiventoscience.Itfullyconsidersthestudents"interests,thetimerequiredbythecurrentcapabilitiesandtocompletethetask.Therefore,intheinitialstageofclassroom,thetaskshouldberelativelysimplesothateverystudenthasaninteresttoparticipate.Then,teacherscangraduallybringcertaindifficultyandchallengingtasks.Studentscangetresultsthroughtheinformationsearch,observation,analysis,reasoning,operationprocess.Inthisway,studentsinterestinmoredurable,andconfidencewillbesetupafterthesuccessfulchallenge.(3)Teachersshouldensurethatlearnersusethecorrectlanguagetypeinthecompletionoftasksanddisplayresults.Learnerstendtoappearthefollowingsituations.Althoughactivelyparticipatinginthecompletionoftasksandactivities,learnerscannotsuccessfullyrealizeresults,makeimproperexpressionandproperlyexpressthemselves.Therefore,theteachermustmakelearnersunderstandthatthegoalisnottocompletethetaskbuttomasterrulesforlanguageuseinrealcommunicationthroughtheprocessofcompletionoftasks.(4)Teachersshouldprovideenoughopportunitiesforlearnertooutputresults.InthetraditionalChinesehighschoolEnglishclassroomswithteachers’controlandguide,studentsmaydowell,buttheydonotknowhowtousethelanguageafterclass.Therefore,teachersshouldpayattentiontolettingthelearnerscarryonactivitieswithoutthecontrolofteachers.Theteachershouldfullyconsiderstudents"dutiesandpower,anddonotmaketoomuchinterventionsothatlearnersinthecourseofactivitieshavegreater19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)freedomtoplayandconsciouslyresponsiblefortheirownlearningactivities.ChapterFourReflectionandExpectation4.1Limitationsoftheresearch1、Samplesisfew.Restrictedbytime,thisstudyonlyselectstwoparallelclassesof121studentsofthefirstgrade.Notask-basedgrammarteachingmethodcarriesonlongitudinalstudy.What"smore,onlyaselectionofaseniorhighschoolinthefirstgradetwoclassesmayreflecttheresultsoftheexperiment.2、Theexperimentaltimeisshorter,theauthorcouldnothavemoreclasstodesigneachgrammaticalitemsandthenintotheexperiments,sotheexperimentalresultswillcertainlyhaveerrors.Therefore,howtoavoidthetimeandgrammaticalitemsselectionleadstoanerror,whichisaproblemworthyofdiscussion.3、Thedesign,systemandcontinuityoftaskisarelativelydifficultfactortograsp,suchasthedegreeofdifficulty,taskofarticulation,conversionbetweentherealtaskandapracticedrillstillneedtobefurtherdiscussed.4.2Suggestionsforfurtherresearch1、theexperimentaldesigndoesn"tseemtobesopreciseandsubtleasitishoped.2、thesampleofthesubjectsisnotlargeenough.Participantsofthepresentresearchareonly100studentsinaseniormiddleschool.Thereforetheresultsfromthepresentresearchmaynotbeapplicabletothestudentsofdifferentproficiencylevel.Thegeneralfindingsoftheexperimentrequirefurtherresearch.3、thedurationoftheexperimentisnotlongenough.Itisnotsureifbetterresultwillstillemergeinthelongitudinalstudy.ConclusionThisarticlehascarriedontheexperimentanalysisaboutthenewpatternofTask-basedlanguageteachingunderthenewbackgroundofthehighschoolEnglish19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)grammarteaching.Thischapterwillconcludethestudy,andproposeproblemsandplacesneededtoresearchdeeply,andputforwardthesuggestionsofgrammarteaching.ThroughexperimentalstudyofTask-basedgrammarteachingandtheanalysisofexperimentalresultsanddiscussion,thefollowingconclusioncanbegot:First,Task-basedgrammarteachingimprovestudents"Englishgrades,whichisveryconsistentwiththeteachingrequirementsofthecontextofChinesecollegeentranceexamination.Thusitcanbeseenthattask-basedgrammarteachingplaysaroleintherelationshipbetweentraditionallanguagemeaningandform,andtoacertainextentbalancesthecontradictionbetweenthequantityofknowledgeandthecommunicatingrequirements.Second,Task-basedgrammarteachingcaneffectivelystimulatestudents"motivationinEnglishlearning,andcausethemtothinkactivelyintheprocessoflearning.Itwakestheinneremotionofstudentsasanindependentindividual,andtrainsthestudents"personalityconsciousness,andpromotesstudent’sintereststostudy.Third,Task-basedgrammarteachingconsciouslyguidestudentstoapplywhattheyhavelearntinclass,andgettherealexperiencesoastoeffectivelyimprovethestudentscomprehensivequalityoflanguageanddevelopmentofcomprehensiveability.Fourth,thelearner"sinterestisinthefirstplace.Oncethelearninginterestwasaroused,learner"smainbodyconsciousnesscanobtainthefulldisplay,andthestudyeffectcanbeenhanced.Therefore,intheprocessofteaching,teachersshouldcultivatethestudents"interestinlearning,andarousestudents"learningenthusiasm.Experimentsprovethattheimplementationoftaskisaneffectivemethodofteachingactivitiesandarousingstudents"interestinlearning.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)Bibliography[1]Brown,H.D.PrinciplesofLanguageLearningandTeaching.[M].Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress.1994.[2]Burden,P.RClassroommanagementanddiscipline.[M]NewYork:Longman.1995.[3]DavidNunanpracticalEnglishlanguageteachinggrammar[M].Beijing:HighereducationPress.2007.[4]Davies,P.&E.Pearse.SuccessinEnglishTeaching.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.2000.[5]Ellis,R.Task-BasedLanguagelearningandTeaching[M].Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.2003.[6]Ellis,R.UnderstandingSecondlanguageAcquisition.[M]OxfordUniversityPress.1985.[7]Ellis,R.Task-basedlanguagelearningandteaching.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.2003.[8]Hammer,JThePracticeofEnglishLanguageTeaching.NewYork:LongmangroupLimited.1991.[9]Gas,S.&Sellinker.SecondLanguageAcquisition:AnIntroductoryCourse[M]Mahawah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociation.2001.[10]Krashen,STheinputhypothesis:issueandimplications.London:Longman.1985.[11]Nunan,DLanguageTeachingMethodology.NewYork:PrenticeHall.1991.[12]Nunan,DDesigningTasksfortheCommunicativeClassroom.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress.1989.[13]Richards,JApproachesandMethodsinLanguageTeaching.[M]Beijing:ForeignLanguageteachingandResearchPress.2000.[14]Wills,Aflexibleframeworkfortask-basedlanguagelearninginWills,J.&Wills,D:challengeandinlanguageteaching.MacmillanPublishersLimited,UK.1996.[15]Willis,J.1996.AframeworkforTask-basedLearning.[M]NewYork:Longman.[16]陈坚林,现代外语教学研究,上海外语教育出版社,2004.[17]程雪霞,任务型教学在高中英语语法教学中的运用[J],山东师范大学,2005.[18]戴伟栋,陈莉萍:二语语法教学理论综述[J],外语教学与研究,2005,(2).[19]洪梅,“交际性英语语法教学初探”[J].商丘职业技术学院学报2005.[20]刘冬梅,“突出语篇,融入语境,分析与综合”[J].基础教育外语教学研究2003,P27.[21]马福康,“关于当前中学英语语法教学”[J].外语界1998,P74.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)[22]宋能祥,“中学英语语法教学新思路”[J].基础教育研究2003.[23]王蔷,英语教学法教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社2000,P38.[24]许燕,“英语语法教学新策略”[J].江西教育2005,P3.[25]杨爱玲:“任务型教学模式在高中英语语法教学中的应用研究——以高中英语定语从句教学为例”[J].西北师范大学,2007.19 滨州学院本科毕业设计(论文)AcknowledgmentsMythanksarefirstgiventomyrespectedsupervisor,Prof.whoseinsightfulinstructionandconstantsupportthroughouttheprocesshavefilledmewithconfidenceandpersistencetocompletethisthesis.IwouldalsoexpressmysincerethankstosomeoftheteachersinForeignLanguagesDepartmentwhoprovidedvaluablesuggestionsandimportantinformationformythesis.I"malsoverygratefultothoseauthorsandwriterswhoseworkshadbeenreferredtoandwhosewordsorideasbeenquotedinmythesis.Myappreciationalsogoestomyfriendsandclassmates,whohavebeengivingmesincereencouragementandconsolationandbeengenerousinsharingrelevantmaterialswithme.19